The Best Code Review Software in 2026
We researched code review software through official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables, and product documentation. Rankings reflect each product’s core review job, value for money, and verified features for teams assessing source-code changes before integration.
Our top picks
-
Top ranked
Bito#1 of 519.4/10A broad code-review platform for teams that want analysis across hosts, tools, and workflows.
Free plan · 14-day trial
-
Runner-up
Sourcery#2 of 519.3/10Broad AI review and security coverage with a free plan and paid team features.
Free plan · 14-day trial
-
Top-ranked free plan
PR-Agent#3 of 519.2/10A flexible, self-hosted PR review agent with broad integrations and configurable AI workflows.
Free plan
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
The full ranking 51 tools, best first · page 1 of 2
-
Best forCross-platform teams needing deep analysis
A broad code-review platform for teams that want analysis across hosts, tools, and workflows.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
Free plan · 14-day trial Our Bito verdict → Visit BitoFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #1 · $149/mo →9.4/10★★★★★Visit Bito -
Best forTeams wanting broad AI review coverage
Broad AI review and security coverage with a free plan and paid team features.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
Free plan · 14-day trial Our Sourcery verdict → Visit SourceryFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #2 · $99/mo →9.3/10★★★★★Visit Sourcery -
Best forOpen-source teams wanting maximum flexibility
A flexible, self-hosted PR review agent with broad integrations and configurable AI workflows.
- Security analysis
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
9.2/10★★★★★Visit PR-Agent -
Best forLarge teams needing broad integrations
A broad code review platform with strong host coverage, automation, and security tiers.
- Security analysis
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
Free plan · 14-day trial Our CodeRabbit verdict → Visit CodeRabbitFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #4 · $69/mo →9.1/10★★★★★Visit CodeRabbit -
Best forBudget-conscious teams needing advanced analysis
Affordable AI code review with repository analysis, custom rules, and self-hosting.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit Mesrai -
Best forEngineering teams handling high pull-request volume
Gitar reviews pull requests in context, commits fixes and reruns CI until the change is verified.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit Gitar -
Best forSecurity-focused enterprise review programs
A strong fit for enterprise teams that need governed, security-focused code review.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Qodo -
Best forOpen-source teams wanting self-hosted AI review
A full-context AI reviewer for teams that want control over hosting and model choice.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Mira -
Best forContext-rich reviews with deployment flexibility
A context-rich AI reviewer with flexible deployment and a free starting tier.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Greptile -
Best forTraditional review teams needing broad SCM support
A broad, open-source review platform for teams working across varied repository systems.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Review Board -
Best forTeams wanting flexible AI-provider deployment
A context-aware code review tool with broad AI-provider and deployment flexibility.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Octopus -
Best forTeams wanting broad platform and IDE coverage
Broad Git, IDE, AI, and deployment coverage, with a relatively high Premium price.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit LiveReview -
Best forSecurity-heavy teams needing self-hosting
A broad, security-focused review platform with self-hosting and no free plan.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit CodeAnt AI -
Best forSmall teams wanting affordable contextual review
A focused AI code-review tool for small teams that want context and automation.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit CodeKang -
Best forGitHub users needing sandboxed specialist reviews
A GitHub-focused review platform with automated analysis, specialist agents, and sandbox controls.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Ellipsis -
Best forGitHub users seeking low-cost evidence-based review
Affordable GitHub PR reviews with evidence-based findings and agent integrations.
- Security analysis
- AI code review
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit Rami -
Best forTeams wanting inexpensive configurable reviews
An inexpensive, configurable AI reviewer for teams across four code hosts.
- Security analysis
- AI code review
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Pullora -
Best forTeams wanting inexpensive multi-agent reviews
Affordable multi-agent reviews with strong repository coverage and limited platform support.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit Revue -
Best forOrganizations building their own review workflow
A configurable self-hosted review system for organizations building their own workflow.
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit Gerrit -
Best forTeams wanting simple GitHub or GitLab automation
A focused AI code-review tool for GitHub and GitLab workflows.
- Review analytics
- AI code review
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit Commitloom -
Best forTeams automating review routing and policy
A strong fit for teams that want programmable review routing and merge automation.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit gitStream -
Best forGitHub teams using stacked pull requests
A strong fit for GitHub teams that organize work with stacked pull requests.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- AI code review
7.3/10★★★★☆Visit Graphite -
Best forGitHub teams wanting configurable AI review
Configurable multi-agent GitHub reviews with severity labels, verification, and analytics.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- AI code review
7.1/10★★★★☆Visit Anthropic -
Best forHarness users wanting governed risk-based review
A governed AI review option for Harness teams working in GitHub or Harness Code Repository.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- AI code review
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit Harness -
Best forSecurity teams prioritizing exploitability context
A security-focused code review layer for teams that need exploitability context.
- Security analysis
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
6.9/10★★★☆☆Visit HackerOne -
Best forGitHub teams wanting automated issue resolution
Automates detailed GitHub pull request reviews and requested issue resolution.
- Security analysis
- AI code review
6.8/10★★★☆☆Visit Squire -
Best forTeams wanting free basic quality analysis
A capable free starting point for basic quality analysis on public repositories.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
6.7/10★★★☆☆Visit CodeFactor -
Best forTeams wanting affordable standard AI reviews
Affordable AI-assisted pull-request reviews with analytics, policies, and security checks.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
6.6/10★★★☆☆Visit Korbit AI -
Best forTeams wanting customizable enterprise AI review
Customizable AI review with security analysis, automation, and enterprise deployment options.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
6.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Baz -
Best forGitHub teams needing detailed approval routing
A focused GitHub tool for policy-driven ownership, routing, and approvals.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
6.4/10★★★☆☆Visit PullApprove -
Best forBudget-conscious GitHub review workflow teams
A budget-friendly GitHub review hub with dashboards, workflow actions, analytics, and AI assistance.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
6.3/10★★★☆☆Visit PullFlow -
Best forOpen-source teams needing hosting and review
A flexible, free foundation for teams that want control over repositories and review workflows.
- Self-hosted deployment
6.2/10★★★☆☆Visit Phorge -
Best forCI teams routing existing diagnostics into reviews
A focused, self-hosted way to route diagnostic findings into code reviews.
- Security analysis
- Self-hosted deployment
6.1/10★★★☆☆Visit reviewdog -
Best forMature teams using traditional review workflows
A structured, self-hosted review tool for teams with established workflows.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit Devart -
Best forEnterprise teams needing legacy SCM support
A structured review platform with strong legacy source-control coverage and customer-managed deployment.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
5.9/10★★★☆☆Visit SmartBear -
Best forRegulated teams needing mature self-hosting
A mature self-hosted review platform for regulated teams, with strong governance and repository coverage.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
5.8/10★★★☆☆Visit RhodeCode -
Best forGitHub teams focused on rigorous human review
A structured human-review workflow for GitHub teams, with strong revision tracking and controls.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
5.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Reviewable -
Best forTeams wanting configurable multi-host Bugbot reviews
Configurable AI pull-request reviews across four major code hosts, with usage-based billing.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- AI code review
5.6/10★★★☆☆Visit Cursor Bugbot -
Best forSelf-hosted GitHub teams needing controlled review stages
A controlled, self-hosted AI reviewer for GitHub teams that want staged analysis.
- Security analysis
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit ReviewSensei -
Best forGitHub teams focused on runtime-tested pull requests
GitHub-only reviews that run affected flows and attach evidence to findings.
- Review analytics
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Ito -
Best forGitHub teams with specialized review checks
A focused GitHub reviewer for teams with custom checks and security rules.
- Security analysis
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Surmado -
Best forSelf-hosted GitHub teams needing provenance controls
A self-hosted GitHub review bot with strong provenance and observability controls.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Sovri -
Best forPerforce teams wanting free integrated review
A free, workflow-focused review tool for teams already using P4.
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit P4 Code Review -
Best forSecurity-focused teams needing customer-hosted analysis
A security-focused review platform with strong controls and a high entry price.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit CodeGuards.io -
Best forTeams wanting scheduled whole-codebase reports
Whole-codebase reviews with scheduled reports, severity ranking, and AI-generated fixes.
- Security analysis
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Holycode -
Best forGitHub teams organizing complex reviews into chapters
A focused GitHub review layer for teams that need clearer pull-request structure.
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Stage -
Best forGitHub teams wanting a free self-hosted reviewer
A free self-hosted GitHub reviewer with flexible LLM options and a narrow scope.
- Self-hosted deployment
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Robin Review -
Best forGitHub teams wanting configurable lint reviews
A focused GitHub lint reviewer for teams that want configurable style checks.
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Hound -
Best forGitHub teams adopting Cubic’s workflow
A GitHub-focused review platform with custom agents, scans, fixes, and analytics.
- Security analysis
- Review analytics
- AI code review
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit Cubic -
Best forEnterprises with complex multi-repository workflows
A workflow-focused review platform for complex, multi-repository development teams.
- Review analytics
- Self-hosted deployment
5.5/10★★★☆☆Visit GitColony
No tools match those filters.
Compare at a glance
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Supported code hosts | Automated analysis | AI code review | Custom review rules | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bito | Yes | $12/seat/mo | GitHub, GitHub Self-Managed, GitLab, GitLab Self-Managed, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Self-Managed | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.4 |
| 2 | Sourcery | Yes | $12/seat/mo | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server, self-hosted GitLab | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.3 |
| 3 | PR-Agent | Yes | Free | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, CodeCommit, Gitea | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.2 |
| 4 | CodeRabbit | Yes | $24/user/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.1 |
| 5 | Mesrai | No | $6/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure Repos | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.0 |
| 6 | Gitar | No | $20/user/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9.0 |
| 7 | Qodo | No | $30/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.9 |
| 8 | Mira | Yes | Free | GitHub, GitLab, Forgejo, Codeberg | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.8 |
| 9 | Greptile | Yes | $30/seat/mo | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise, self-hosted GitHub/GitLab | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.6 |
| 10 | Review Board | Yes | $6/user/mo | Git, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Perforce, Mercurial, Subversion, Breezy, CVS, Azure DevOps, ClearCase, Keysight SOS | Yes | No | Yes | 8.5 |
| 11 | Octopus | Yes | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.4 | |
| 12 | LiveReview | Yes | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.3 | |
| 13 | CodeAnt AI | No | $20/user/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.2 |
| 14 | CodeKang | Yes | $19/seat/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.1 |
| 15 | Ellipsis | Yes | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8.0 | |
| 16 | Rami Code Review | Yes | $7/mo | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.9 |
| 17 | Pullora | Yes | $9/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.8 |
| 18 | Revue | Yes | $9/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.7 |
| 19 | Gerrit Code Review | Yes | Free | Git | Yes | Yes | 7.6 | |
| 20 | Commitloom | Yes | GitHub, GitLab | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.5 | |
| 21 | gitStream | Yes | $29/user/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.4 |
| 22 | Graphite | Yes | $20/user/mo | GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Cloud, GitHub Enterprise Server | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.3 |
| 23 | Claude Code Review | No | GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Server | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.1 | |
| 24 | Harness AI Code Review | Yes | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7.0 | |
| 25 | HackerOne Code | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | 6.9 | |||
| 26 | Squire | No | $20/user/mo | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6.8 |
| 27 | CodeFactor | Yes | GitHub, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | 6.7 | ||
| 28 | Korbit AI | No | $12/user/mo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6.6 |
| 29 | Baz | No | GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6.5 | |
| 30 | PullApprove | Yes | $4/user/mo | GitHub, GitLab | Yes | No | Yes | 6.4 |
| 31 | PullFlow | Yes | $5/user/mo | GitHub | Yes | 6.3 | ||
| 32 | Phorge | Yes | Free | Git, Mercurial, Subversion | Yes | Yes | 6.2 | |
| 33 | reviewdog | Yes | Free | GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, GitLab, Gerrit, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | 6.1 | |
| 34 | Review Assistant | Yes | $349.95 one-time | Team Foundation Server, Azure DevOps, Git, Subversion, Mercurial, Perforce | Yes | 6.0 | ||
| 35 | SmartBear Collaborator | Yes | Git, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Subversion, Perforce, AccuRev, Mercurial, MKS Integrity, Rational ClearCase, Rational Synergy, Rational Team Concert, Team Foundation Server | Yes | 5.9 | |||
| 36 | RhodeCode Enterprise | No | $75/user/yr | Git, Mercurial, Subversion | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.8 |
| 37 | Reviewable | Yes | $8/unit/mo | GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Cloud, GitHub Enterprise Server | Yes | 5.7 | ||
| 38 | Cursor Bugbot | No | GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.6 | |
| 39 | ReviewSensei | Free | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | |
| 40 | Ito | Yes | $40/user/mo | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 |
| 41 | Surmado Code Review | Yes | $15/mo | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 |
| 42 | Sovri | Yes | Free | GitHub | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | |
| 43 | P4 Code Review | Yes | $39/user/mo | P4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 |
| 44 | CodeGuards.io | No | €189/mo | GitLab, GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 |
| 45 | Code Review by Holycode | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | |||
| 46 | Stage | Yes | GitHub | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | ||
| 47 | Robin Review | Yes | Free | GitHub | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | |
| 48 | Hound | Yes | GitHub | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | ||
| 49 | Cubic | Yes | GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5.5 | |
| 50 | GitColony | No | $2,500/seat/yr | GitHub, Bitbucket | Yes | Yes | 5.5 |
Head-to-head All 28 comparisons →
- Bito vs Sourcery
- Bito vs PR-Agent
- Bito vs CodeRabbit
- Bito vs Mesrai
- Bito vs Qodo
- Bito vs Mira
- Bito vs Greptile
- Sourcery vs PR-Agent
- Sourcery vs CodeRabbit
Explore other topics All topics →
- AI Tools 303 directories · 8,267 tools ranked AI Writing Tools · AI Video Generators · Text-to-Speech Software
- Web Hosting & Domains 273 directories · 6,063 tools ranked Shared Web Hosting · Managed Cloud Hosting · Dedicated Server Hosting
- Productivity 156 directories · 4,890 tools ranked Note-Taking Apps · Calendar Apps · Project Management Software
- Marketing 133 directories · 3,904 tools ranked SEO Tools · Influencer Marketing Platforms · Email Marketing Software
- Sales & CRM 152 directories · 4,161 tools ranked Real Estate CRM Software · CRM Software · Proposal Software
- Customer Service 55 directories · 1,547 tools ranked Chatbot Builders · Knowledge Base Software · Call Center Software
How we rank code review software
Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update