Best VMware Live Site Recovery Alternatives in 2026
The top VMware Live Site Recovery alternatives are Azure Site Recovery, Veeam Recovery Orchestrator and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery: 15 disaster recovery software our editors would look at instead of VMware Live Site Recovery, in our ranking order.
VMware Live Site Recovery: A focused choice for orchestrating recovery across paired VMware sites. Where it falls short: focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types..
Switching from VMware Live Site Recovery? For most disaster recovery software buyers the best VMware Live Site Recovery alternative is Azure Site Recovery, built for azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes has a free plan.
Why People Look for a VMware Live Site Recovery Alternative
- Focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types
- Pricing requires contact with a VMware account representative
- Requires a paired VMware-site and replication integration strategy
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallAzure Site Recovery9.4
Azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises
Visit Azure Site Recovery - Best free optionVeeam Kasten for Kubernetes8.2
Has a free plan
Visit Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes - Most rpo targetAzure Site Recovery9.4
0.5 min
Visit Azure Site Recovery
All 15 VMware Live Site Recovery Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forAzure- and hybrid-environment enterprises
- Better than VMware Live Site Recovery:
- Editor score 9.4 vs 9.2
Broad hybrid workload coverage with orchestration, testing, and a 31-day trial.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.4/10★★★★★Visit site -
Best forVeeam environments needing tested recovery plans
- Better than VMware Live Site Recovery:
- Editor score 9.3 vs 9.2
A Veeam-centered platform for orchestrated, tested failover and recovery operations.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.3/10★★★★★Visit Veeam -
Best forAWS-centric teams with transparent hourly pricing
A focused AWS recovery service with clear hourly pricing and separate traffic management.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Test failover
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit AWS DRS -
Best forBusinesses needing broad cloud DR orchestration
Broad cloud DR orchestration for service providers managing mixed infrastructure.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit Acronis -
Best forMulti-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery
A capable multi-cloud recovery platform for teams that need near-synchronous protection.
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Zerto -
Best forMixed Windows and Linux high availability
A broad disaster recovery platform for mixed Windows and Linux high-availability workloads.
- Failback orchestration
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
Pricing on request · 30-day trial Our Arcserve Replication and High Availability verdict → Visit Arcserve8.8/10★★★★☆Visit Arcserve -
Best forMSPs managing multi-tenant backup DR
A hybrid DR platform with five-minute backups, virtualization, failback, and multi-tenant management.
- Failback orchestration
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit Datto SIRIS -
Best forSMBs wanting guided hybrid DR
A guided hybrid DR platform with failover orchestration, testing, and broad workload coverage.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Infrascale -
Best forOrganizations needing broad backup-led DR
Broad backup-led disaster recovery with strong workload coverage and contact-sales pricing.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Arcserve UDP -
Best forNetApp storage estates needing VM DR
A focused DR service for NetApp storage estates protecting VMware and Kubernetes workloads.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit NetApp -
Best forIBM Power environments
A specialized choice for automated failover, recovery, and replication across IBM Power environments.
- Failback orchestration
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit IBM -
Best forKubernetes teams wanting a free DR tier
A strong Kubernetes-focused DR platform with a useful free tier and broad mobility.
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Veeam -
Best forEnterprises prioritizing cyber-resilient recovery
A cloud-managed service for orchestrated, cyber-resilient recovery across hybrid environments.
- Failover orchestration
- Test failover
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit IBM -
Best forMixed-workload teams wanting recovery assurance
Mixed-workload backup with recovery testing, immutable storage, and broad infrastructure support.
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Unitrends -
Best forAPI-first teams building custom DR workflows
An API-first DR platform for custom, cross-cloud recovery workflows.
- Failback orchestration
- Recovery runbooks
- Failover orchestration
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit Capacia
VMware Live Site Recovery Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to VMware Live Site Recovery?
Azure Site Recovery: #1 in our Disaster Recovery Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. Broad hybrid workload coverage with orchestration, testing, and a 31-day trial.
Is there a free alternative to VMware Live Site Recovery?
Yes. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes has a free plan or a free tier.
Why do people look for VMware Live Site Recovery alternatives?
Focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types; Pricing requires contact with a VMware account representative; Requires a paired VMware-site and replication integration strategy.
Which VMware Live Site Recovery alternative has the most rpo target?
Azure Site Recovery, with 0.5 min.
How do I switch from VMware Live Site Recovery?
Export your data from VMware Live Site Recovery (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel VMware Live Site Recovery.
How to Switch from VMware Live Site Recovery
- Export your data from VMware Live Site Recovery (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel VMware Live Site Recovery.
VMware Live Site Recovery vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Failover orchestration | Deployment model | Supported workloads | Failback orchestration | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | VMware Live Site Recovery | Yes | Hybrid | virtual machines | Yes | 9.2 | ||
| 1 | Azure Site Recovery | No | Yes | Hybrid | Azure VMs; VMware VMs; Hyper-V VMs; Windows physical servers; Linux physical servers; Azure Stack VMs; AWS Windows instances | Yes | 9.4 | |
| 2 | Veeam Recovery Orchestrator | No | Yes | On-premises | VMware vSphere VMs, Hyper-V VMs, Veeam agent backups, CDP replicas, storage-replicated VMs, Microsoft Azure recovery workloads | Yes | 9.3 | |
| 3 | AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | No | $0.03/unit usage-based | No | Hybrid | physical servers, VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, Amazon EC2, other cloud infrastructure, Windows and Linux applications, Oracle, MySQL, SQL Server, SAP | Yes | 9.0 |
| 4 | Acronis Disaster Recovery | Yes | Hybrid | Windows Server, Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, Active Directory, Linux Server, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, Proxmox, Nutanix, Scale Computing, Citrix XenServer | Yes | 9.0 | ||
| 5 | Zerto | No | 8.9 | |||||
| 6 | Arcserve Replication and High Availability | No | Yes | Hybrid | Windows and Linux systems; physical and virtual machines; Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint, IIS, Hyper-V, Dynamics CRM, VMware vCenter, Oracle Database, custom applications | Yes | 8.8 | |
| 7 | Datto SIRIS | Yes | Hybrid | Windows Server, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V | Yes | 8.7 | ||
| 8 | Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery | No | Yes | Hybrid | Physical servers, virtual machines, Windows, Linux, VMware, Hyper-V, SQL Server, Exchange Server | Yes | 8.6 | |
| 9 | Arcserve UDP | No | 8.5 | |||||
| 10 | NetApp Disaster Recovery | No | Yes | Hybrid | VMware virtual machines; Kubernetes clusters | Yes | 8.4 | |
| 11 | IBM PowerHA SystemMirror | No | Yes | Hybrid | AIX, IBM i, DB2, Oracle, SAP, WebSphere | Yes | 8.3 | |
| 12 | Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes | Yes | Yes | Hybrid | Kubernetes applications, containerized applications, virtual machines on Kubernetes, AI workloads, relational and NoSQL systems | 8.2 | ||
| 13 | IBM Storage Defender Data Resiliency Service | Yes | Hybrid | virtual machines, storage systems, backup systems, applications | 8.1 | |||
| 14 | Unitrends Backup | No | 8.0 | |||||
| 15 | Capacia Disaster Recovery Platform | Yes | Hybrid | Yes | 7.9 |
Head-to-Head
- VMware Live Site Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery
- VMware Live Site Recovery vs Veeam Recovery Orchestrator
- VMware Live Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
- VMware Live Site Recovery vs Acronis Disaster Recovery
- VMware Live Site Recovery vs Zerto
- VMware Live Site Recovery vs Arcserve Replication and High Availability
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update