Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Disaster Recovery Software

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Site Recovery

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Azure Site Recovery #1 in Disaster Recovery Software 9.4/10 31-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit site
VMware Live Site Recovery #3 in Disaster Recovery Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Contact VMware

Azure Site Recovery leads on 0 checks, VMware Live Site Recovery on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAzure Site Recovery · 9.4/10
  • Free trialonly Azure Site Recovery

Azure Site Recovery scores higher on our rubric for disaster recovery software: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Azure Site Recovery is the better fit for azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises. VMware Live Site Recovery is the better fit for VMware environments requiring site recovery.

  • Azure Site Recovery fits best

    Azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises

  • VMware Live Site Recovery fits best

    VMware environments requiring site recovery

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Azure Site Recovery 9.4/10 Visit ↗ VMware Live Site Recovery 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.2
Ranking #1 in Disaster Recovery Software #3 in Disaster Recovery Software
Best for Azure- and hybrid-environment enterprises VMware environments requiring site recovery
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial 31 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Email, Phone, Live chat, Community, Docs Tickets, Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Azure Site Recovery 4/4 · VMware Live Site Recovery 4/4
Failover orchestration ✓ ✓
Failback orchestration ✓ ✓
Test failover ✓ ✓
Recovery runbooks ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Supported workloads Azure VMs; VMware VMs; Hyper-V VMs; Windows physical servers; Linux physical servers; Azure Stack VMs; AWS Windows instances virtual machines
RPO target 0.5 min Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports Azure, VMware, Hyper-V, physical, Azure Stack, and AWS Windows workloads
  • Orchestrates failover, failback, recovery plans, and runbook-driven workflows
  • Enables non-disruptive testing with application-consistent recovery points
  • Centralizes recovery plans for failover, migration, testing, and failback.
  • Supports vSphere Replication and array-based replication through SRAs.
  • Covers on-premises and hyperscaler VMware virtual-machine deployments.
Cons
  • Post-trial pricing is displayed as $-/month per instance protected
  • Storage, transactions, data transfer, and compute can add charges
  • The 30-second replication frequency applies to Hyper-V, not every workload
  • Focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types.
  • Pricing requires contact with a VMware account representative.
  • Requires a paired VMware-site and replication integration strategy.
Our verdict

Azure Site Recovery is a managed disaster recovery service for enterprises protecting Azure, on-premises, and hybrid workloads. It replicates Azure VMs, VMware and Hyper-V VMs, physical servers, Azure Stack VMs, and AWS Windows instances…

Read the review →

VMware Live Site Recovery orchestrates disaster recovery for virtualized applications across paired VMware sites. It is designed for IT administrators responsible for infrastructure resiliency and recovery, with support for on-premises and…

Read the review →
  1. Azure Site RecoveryDisaster Recovery Software 9.431-day trial
  2. VMware Live Site RecoveryDisaster Recovery Software 9.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Azure Site Recovery — where it wins

    • Supports Azure, VMware, Hyper-V, physical, Azure Stack, and AWS Windows workloads
    • Orchestrates failover, failback, recovery plans, and runbook-driven workflows
    • Enables non-disruptive testing with application-consistent recovery points

    Where it doesn't

    • Post-trial pricing is displayed as $-/month per instance protected
    • Storage, transactions, data transfer, and compute can add charges
    • The 30-second replication frequency applies to Hyper-V, not every workload
  • VMware Live Site Recovery — where it wins

    • Centralizes recovery plans for failover, migration, testing, and failback.
    • Supports vSphere Replication and array-based replication through SRAs.
    • Covers on-premises and hyperscaler VMware virtual-machine deployments.

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types.
    • Pricing requires contact with a VMware account representative.
    • Requires a paired VMware-site and replication integration strategy.
  • Azure Site Recovery9.4/10 · 31-day trial

    Broad hybrid workload coverage with orchestration, testing, and a 31-day trial.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • VMware Live Site Recovery9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused choice for orchestrating recovery across paired VMware sites.

    Contact VMwareFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update