Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Disaster Recovery Software

VMware Live Site Recovery vs Zerto

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score VMware Live Site Recovery #3 in Disaster Recovery Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Contact VMware
Zerto #6 in Disaster Recovery Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Zerto

VMware Live Site Recovery leads on 0 checks, Zerto on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreVMware Live Site Recovery · 9.2/10
  • Free trialonly Zerto
  • Most featuresVMware Live Site Recovery · 4 of 4

VMware Live Site Recovery scores higher on our rubric for disaster recovery software: 9.2 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

VMware Live Site Recovery is the better fit for VMware environments requiring site recovery. Zerto is the better fit for multi-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery.

  • VMware Live Site Recovery fits best

    VMware environments requiring site recovery

  • Zerto fits best

    Multi-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature VMware Live Site Recovery 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Zerto 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.9
Ranking #3 in Disaster Recovery Software #6 in Disaster Recovery Software
Best for VMware environments requiring site recovery Multi-cloud teams needing near-synchronous recovery
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request · 14-day trial
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Docs Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 7 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features VMware Live Site Recovery 4/4 · Zerto 0/4
Failover orchestration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Failback orchestration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Test failover ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Recovery runbooks ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Not checked yet
Supported workloads virtual machines Not checked yet
RPO target Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Centralizes recovery plans for failover, migration, testing, and failback.
  • Supports vSphere Replication and array-based replication through SRAs.
  • Covers on-premises and hyperscaler VMware virtual-machine deployments.
  • Near-synchronous replication with journal-based granular recovery points
  • Clean-room recovery and immutable copies support ransomware resilience
  • Automated failover, failback, migration, testing, and SLA analytics
Cons
  • Focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types.
  • Pricing requires contact with a VMware account representative.
  • Requires a paired VMware-site and replication integration strategy.
  • Standard pricing is not published and requires contacting sales
  • The 14-day offer is a trial rather than a free plan
  • Its broad enterprise scope may exceed simpler recovery needs
Our verdict

VMware Live Site Recovery orchestrates disaster recovery for virtualized applications across paired VMware sites. It is designed for IT administrators responsible for infrastructure resiliency and recovery, with support for on-premises and…

Read the review →

Zerto is a data-protection platform for enterprises and managed service providers. It combines continuous data protection, near-synchronous replication, journal-based recovery, disaster recovery orchestration, workload mobility, analytics,…

Read the review →
  1. VMware Live Site RecoveryDisaster Recovery Software 9.2Pricing on request
  2. ZertoDisaster Recovery Software 8.9Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • VMware Live Site Recovery — where it wins

    • Centralizes recovery plans for failover, migration, testing, and failback.
    • Supports vSphere Replication and array-based replication through SRAs.
    • Covers on-premises and hyperscaler VMware virtual-machine deployments.

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on virtual-machine workloads rather than broader workload types.
    • Pricing requires contact with a VMware account representative.
    • Requires a paired VMware-site and replication integration strategy.
  • Zerto — where it wins

    • Near-synchronous replication with journal-based granular recovery points
    • Clean-room recovery and immutable copies support ransomware resilience
    • Automated failover, failback, migration, testing, and SLA analytics

    Where it doesn't

    • Standard pricing is not published and requires contacting sales
    • The 14-day offer is a trial rather than a free plan
    • Its broad enterprise scope may exceed simpler recovery needs
  • VMware Live Site Recovery9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused choice for orchestrating recovery across paired VMware sites.

    Contact VMwareFull verdict →
  • Zerto8.9/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A capable multi-cloud recovery platform for teams that need near-synchronous protection.

    Visit ZertoFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update