Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best Submittable Alternatives in 2026

The top Submittable alternatives are OpenWater, Reviewr and CommunityForce: 15 application management software our editors would look at instead of Submittable, in our ranking order.

9.2/10Editor score
Submittable9.2 Visit Submittable

Submittable: A broad platform for managing applications, reviews, payments, and program funds. Where it falls short: public pricing is not provided; plans use a contact-sales model.

Switching from Submittable? For most application management software buyers the best Submittable alternative is OpenWater, built for organizations running complex multi-program applications.

Why People Look for a Submittable Alternative

  • Public pricing is not provided; plans use a contact-sales model
  • Enterprise capabilities such as custom integrations require the Enterprise plan
  • PCI payment processing is handled by Stripe rather than Submittable

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 Submittable Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. OpenWater

    Best forOrganizations running complex multi-program applications

    • Better than Submittable:
    • Editor score 9.3 vs 9.2

    A broad platform for managing complex applications, reviews, workflows, funding, and reporting.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    Pricing on request Our OpenWater verdict → Visit OpenWater
    9.3/10★★★★★
    Visit OpenWater
  2. Reviewr

    Best forGrantmakers needing rigorous review controls

    A strong fit for grantmakers that need controlled reviews, scoring and post-award tracking.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    Pricing on request Our Reviewr verdict → Visit Reviewr
    9.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Reviewr
  3. Best forGrant and scholarship administrators

    A broad awards platform for organizations managing applications through renewals and reporting.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit CommunityForce
  4. Best forGrant programs needing end-to-end workflows

    End-to-end grant workflows with portals, reviews, payments, monitoring and audit trails.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    Pricing on request · 14-day trial Our Flexi-Grant verdict → Visit Flexi-Grant
    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Flexi-Grant
  5. Best forBudget-conscious grant programs

    A broad grant-management platform with a published Starter price of $2,500 per year.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit RQ Platform
  6. Best forGrant teams wanting transparent pricing

    A capable grant platform with transparent annual pricing and broad workflow coverage.

    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Good Grants
  7. Best forFoundations tracking grants through outcomes

    A full grant lifecycle system for foundations tracking applications through outcomes.

    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Foundant
  8. Best forEnterprise grant operations

    A broad grant-management platform for complex, multi-stage enterprise programs.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit SmartSimple
  9. Best forLarge submission programs needing automation

    A structured platform for automating complex application and review programs.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Submit.com
  10. Optimy

    Best forGrant teams needing low published entry pricing

    A broad grant management platform with low published entry pricing and limited integrations.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.2/10★★★★☆
    Visit Optimy
  11. Best forGrantmakers needing CRM-style relationships

    A grantmaking system spanning applications, reviews, workflows, payments, and relationships.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    Pricing on request Our GivingData verdict → Visit GivingData
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit GivingData
  12. Best forScholarship programs with reusable applications

    A focused scholarship platform with reusable applications, structured review, and outcome reporting.

    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Foundant
  13. Best forEstablished grantmaking organizations

    A full grant lifecycle platform for established funding organizations.

    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Blackbaud
  14. Best forScholarship programs with disbursement needs

    A full scholarship workflow from application intake through disbursement and outcomes tracking.

    • Payment collection
    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    Pricing on request Our Kaleidoscope verdict → Visit Kaleidoscope
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Kaleidoscope
  15. Best forScholarship offices using student systems

    A focused platform for managing scholarship applications, reviews, awards, and compliance.

    • Reviewer collaboration
    • Applicant portal
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit AwardSpring

Submittable Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to Submittable?

OpenWater: #1 in our Application Management Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.3 out of 10. A broad platform for managing complex applications, reviews, workflows, funding, and reporting.

Why do people look for Submittable alternatives?

Public pricing is not provided; plans use a contact-sales model; Enterprise capabilities such as custom integrations require the Enterprise plan; PCI payment processing is handled by Stripe rather than Submittable.

How do I switch from Submittable?

Export your data from Submittable (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Submittable.

How to Switch from Submittable

  1. Export your data from Submittable (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Submittable.

Submittable vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromScoring and rubricsReviewer collaborationApplicant portalWorkflow automationReporting and analyticsScore
2SubmittableNoYesYesYesYesYes9.2
1OpenWaterYesYesYesYesYes9.3
2ReviewrYesYesYesYesYes9.0
3CommunityForceYesYesYesYesYes8.9
4Flexi-GrantNoYesYesYesYesYes8.8
5RQ PlatformNo$2,500/yrYesYesYesYesYes8.7
6Good GrantsNo$3,950/yrYesYesYesYesYes8.6
7Foundant Grant Lifecycle ManagerYesYesYesYesYes8.5
8SmartSimple Cloud for Grants ManagementNoYesYesYesYesYes8.4
9Submit.comNo€5,995/yrYesYesYesYesYes8.3
10OptimyNo€1,000/yrYesYesYesYesYes8.2
11GivingDataNoYesYesYesYesYes8.1
12Foundant Scholarship Lifecycle ManagerYesYesYesYesYes8.0
13Blackbaud GrantmakingYesYesYesYesYes7.9
14KaleidoscopeYesYesYesYesYes7.8
15AwardSpringYesYesYesYesYes7.7

Head-to-Head

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update