Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

PeerSubmit comparisons

#8 of 29 in Event Abstract Management Software

PeerSubmit is compared head-to-head with Congressio, Sciencesconf and Microsoft CMT and more: 7 head-to-heads in Event Abstract Management Software, each with the specs and prices we checked.

6.8/10Editor score
PeerSubmit6.8 Visit PeerSubmit

PeerSubmit head-to-head

PeerSubmit vs each of them

#ToolFree planPaid fromSubmission typesReview workflowScoring toolsBlind reviewScore
8PeerSubmitNo$100/yrMultipleCustomYesYes6.8
1CongressioYes—MultipleCustomYesYes10.0
2SciencesconfYesNoneMultipleMulti_stageYesYes9.0
3Microsoft CMTYesNone———Yes7.7
4EasyChairYes————Yes7.6
5Oxford AbstractsYes—Abstracts——Yes7.3
6SimplyConfYes$29/yr———Yes7.1
7IndicoYesNone————6.8

Compare PeerSubmit with any event abstract management platform

These are the matchups our editors wrote up. The compare tool pairs PeerSubmit with any other product in Event Abstract Management Software — and up to four at once — from the same checked specs.

Compare PeerSubmit with any tool side by side →

Every event abstract management software head-to-head →

Our full PeerSubmit verdict, pricing and fact sheet →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Compared by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update