Sciencesconf vs PeerSubmit

SSciencesconf9.0Visit PeerSubmit6.8Visit

Higher score S Sciencesconf #2 in Event Abstract Management Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Sciencesconf

vs

PeerSubmit #8 in Event Abstract Management Software 6.8/10 From $100/yr ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit PeerSubmit

• Sciencesconf fits best

  Free abstract and poster review programs

• PeerSubmit fits best

  Teams wanting broad submission types and automation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	SSciencesconf 9.0/10 Visit ↗	PeerSubmit 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.0	6.8
Ranking	#2 in Event Abstract Management Software	#8 in Event Abstract Management Software
Best for	Free abstract and poster review programs	Teams wanting broad submission types and automation
Pricing model	Free	Paid
Starting price	Not published	$100/yr
Free plan	✓ (best)	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email, Docs	Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations	1 integrations	9 integrations
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Sciencesconf 5/5 · PeerSubmit 5/5
Scoring tools	✓	✓
Blind review	✓	✓
Author revisions	✓	✓
Poster handling	✓	✓
Publishing tools	✓	✓
Specs
Submission types	Multiple	Multiple
Review workflow	Multi_stage	Custom
Our review
Pros	Supports abstract, full-text, oral, and poster submissions Configurable weighted scoring and blinded peer review Author revisions and proceedings export to HAL	Supports abstracts, papers, extended abstracts, and posters Configurable blind review, scoring, conflicts, revisions, and decisions Integrates with payment, storage, analytics, and email services
Cons	Designed for scientific conferences, workshops, and meetings Web access is the listed platform option The published offer has a single Free plan	No free plan; paid plans start at $100 per conference per year Starter is limited to 50 submissions API access is available only on the Enterprise plan
Our verdict	Sciencesconf is a web platform for higher-education and research institutions organizing scientific conferences, workshops, and meetings. It combines configurable event websites with abstract and full-text submissions, oral and poster… Read the review →	PeerSubmit is a web-based platform for academic conferences, journals, universities, research organizations, and scientific societies. It manages abstracts, papers, extended abstracts, and posters through customizable forms and structured… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Sciencesconf — where it wins

  • Supports abstract, full-text, oral, and poster submissions
  • Configurable weighted scoring and blinded peer review
  • Author revisions and proceedings export to HAL

  Where it doesn't

  • Designed for scientific conferences, workshops, and meetings
  • Web access is the listed platform option
  • The published offer has a single Free plan

• PeerSubmit — where it wins

  • Supports abstracts, papers, extended abstracts, and posters
  • Configurable blind review, scoring, conflicts, revisions, and decisions
  • Integrates with payment, storage, analytics, and email services

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan; paid plans start at $100 per conference per year
  • Starter is limited to 50 submissions
  • API access is available only on the Enterprise plan

• SSciencesconf9.0/10 · Free plan

  A focused free option for scientific abstract, poster, and peer-review workflows.

  Visit SciencesconfFull verdict →
• PeerSubmit6.8/10 · From $100/yr

  A broad event workflow covering submissions, review, decisions, registration, and AI summaries.

  Visit PeerSubmitFull verdict →