Head-to-head · Event Abstract Management Software
Sciencesconf vs Oxford Abstracts
Sciencesconf leads on 4 checks, Oxford Abstracts on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSciencesconf · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresSciencesconf · 5 of 5
Sciencesconf scores higher on our rubric for event abstract management software: 9.0 against 7.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.
On submission types, Sciencesconf gives you Multiple where Oxford Abstracts offers Abstracts. Sciencesconf offers scoring tools; Oxford Abstracts doesn't publish it. Sciencesconf offers author revisions; Oxford Abstracts doesn't publish it. Sciencesconf offers poster handling; Oxford Abstracts doesn't publish it. Sciencesconf offers publishing tools; Oxford Abstracts doesn't publish it.
Sciencesconf is the better fit for free abstract and poster review programs. Oxford Abstracts is the better fit for large events needing unlimited abstract submissions.
- Sciencesconf fits best
Free abstract and poster review programs
- Oxford Abstracts fits best
Large events needing unlimited abstract submissions
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Sciencesconf 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Oxford Abstracts 7.3/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 7.3 |
| Ranking | #2 in Event Abstract Management Software | #5 in Event Abstract Management Software |
| Best for | Free abstract and poster review programs | Large events needing unlimited abstract submissions |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Tickets, Docs |
| Integrations | 1 integrations | 3 integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Sciencesconf 5/5 · Oxford Abstracts 1/5 | ||
| Scoring tools | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Blind review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Author revisions | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Poster handling | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Publishing tools | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Submission types | Multiple | Abstracts |
| Review workflow | Multi_stage | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Sciencesconf is a web platform for higher-education and research institutions organizing scientific conferences, workshops, and meetings. It combines configurable event websites with abstract and full-text submissions, oral and poster… Read the review → |
Oxford Abstracts is a web-based platform for academic conference organisers managing submissions, reviews, decisions, communications, reports, abstract books, ticketing, registration, and conference programs. It supports configurable… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Sciencesconf — where it wins
- Supports abstract, full-text, oral, and poster submissions
- Configurable weighted scoring and blinded peer review
- Author revisions and proceedings export to HAL
Where it doesn't
- Designed for scientific conferences, workshops, and meetings
- Web access is the listed platform option
- The published offer has a single Free plan
Oxford Abstracts — where it wins
- Unlimited submissions across the listed plans
- Multi-stage, double-blind review with flexible assignments
- Abstract books, schedules, ticketing, and registration in one platform
Where it doesn't
- Paid abstract management starts at $890 per event
- Conference features require the $2,290 per-event plan
- The listed integrations are Stripe, PayPal, and Zoom
- Sciencesconf9.0/10 · Free plan
A focused free option for scientific abstract, poster, and peer-review workflows.
Visit SciencesconfFull verdict → - Oxford Abstracts7.3/10 · Free plan · paid from $890
A broad abstract workflow with unlimited submissions and conference planning tools.
Try Oxford AbstractsFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Congressio vs Sciencesconf
- Congressio vs Oxford Abstracts
- Sciencesconf vs Microsoft CMT
- Sciencesconf vs EasyChair
- Sciencesconf vs SimplyConf
- Sciencesconf vs Indico
- Sciencesconf vs PeerSubmit
- Microsoft CMT vs Oxford Abstracts
All event abstract management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





