Best Internetport Managed Load Balancer Alternatives in 2026
The top Internetport Managed Load Balancer alternatives are AWS Elastic Load Balancing, Google Cloud Load Balancing and Alibaba Cloud Server Load Balancer: 15 load balancer services our editors would look at instead of Internetport Managed Load Balancer, in our ranking order.
Internetport Managed Load Balancer: A budget managed balancer with automatic TLS, HA failover, and web-based management. Where it falls short: platform coverage is limited to the web.
Switching from Internetport Managed Load Balancer? For most load balancer services buyers the best Internetport Managed Load Balancer alternative is AWS Elastic Load Balancing, built for aWS-native applications needing broad load balancing. On a budget, DigitalOcean Load Balancers starts at $15/mo. Traefik Proxy has a free plan, which Internetport Managed Load Balancer does not. Azure Application Gateway offers the most backend target limit (1200).
Why People Look for an Internetport Managed Load Balancer Alternative
- Platform coverage is limited to the web
- Backend target limit is 25
- Pricing is shown excluding VAT
- No free plan — 2 of the alternatives below have it
- Backend target limit: 25 — up to 1200 with Azure Application Gateway
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallAWS Elastic Load Balancing9.4
AWS-native applications needing broad load balancing
Visit AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Lowest priceDigitalOcean Load Balancers7.7
Paid plans from $15/mo
Visit DigitalOcean Load Balancers - Best free optionTraefik Proxy8.6
Has a free plan (Internetport Managed Load Balancer has none)
Visit Traefik Proxy - Most backend target limitAzure Application Gateway8.3
1200
Visit Azure Application Gateway
All 15 Internetport Managed Load Balancer Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forAWS-native applications needing broad load balancing
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 9.4 vs 6.3
A broad AWS-native load balancing service with usage-based pricing and multiple traffic layers.
- TLS termination
9.4/10★★★★★Visit AWS ELB -
Best forGlobal, multi-backend Google Cloud workloads
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 9.2 vs 6.3
A broad managed load balancer for global, hybrid, and multi-backend workloads.
- TLS termination
9.2/10★★★★★Visit Google Cloud -
Best forCost-conscious Alibaba Cloud deployments
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 9.0 vs 6.3
A broad managed balancing service with a clear ALB entry price and Alibaba Cloud integrations.
- TLS termination
9.0/10★★★★☆Visit Alibaba Cloud -
Best forTeams needing advanced self-hosted proxying
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 8.8 vs 6.3
Advanced Layer 4/7 traffic management for teams operating self-hosted applications and APIs.
- TLS termination
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit NGINX Plus -
Best forEnterprises needing self-hosted L4/L7 control
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 6.3
A broad self-hosted load balancer for enterprises that need L4/L7 and global traffic control.
- TLS termination
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit HAProxy -
Best forDevelopers wanting a flexible free proxy
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Free plan
- Editor score 8.6 vs 6.3
A flexible free proxy for teams running self-hosted, cloud-native infrastructure.
- TLS termination
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit Traefik -
Best forEngineers needing powerful open-source proxying
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Free plan
- Editor score 8.5 vs 6.3
A capable self-hosted Layer 7 proxy for teams that want control over traffic management.
- TLS termination
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Envoy -
Best forHybrid and multicloud enterprise delivery
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 6.3
Layer 4/7 balancing and global traffic steering for distributed application estates.
- DNS traffic steering
- Sticky sessions
- TLS termination
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit F5 -
Best forAzure applications needing Layer 7 routing
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Backend target limit: 1200 vs 25
- Editor score 8.3 vs 6.3
A capable Azure gateway for Layer 7 routing, TLS handling, and WAF-enabled traffic management.
- Sticky sessions
- TLS termination
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit Microsoft -
Best forCloud teams needing broad L4/L7 routing
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Backend target limit: 500 vs 25
- Editor score 8.2 vs 6.3
A feature-rich ELB for teams needing both Layer 4 and Layer 7 traffic control.
- Sticky sessions
- TLS termination
8.2/10★★★★☆Visit Huawei Cloud -
Best forTencent Cloud applications needing L4 and L7
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 6.3
A capable Tencent Cloud load balancer for mixed protocol, routing, and resilience needs.
- TLS termination
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Tencent Cloud -
Best forGlobal web apps needing edge delivery and security
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 8.0 vs 6.3
Global load balancing, edge delivery, and security for Azure-hosted web apps and APIs.
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit Front Door -
Best forEnterprises needing appliance-style global balancing
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 6.3
A broad appliance-style ADC for enterprises balancing critical applications across complex environments.
- TLS termination
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit site -
Best forIBM Cloud users needing standard managed LB
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 6.3
A managed IBM Cloud load balancer with broad traffic controls and multi-zone support.
- TLS termination
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit IBM Cloud -
Best forSmall teams wanting simple affordable managed LB
- Better than Internetport Managed Load Balancer:
- Editor score 7.7 vs 6.3
A transparent managed LB service for teams running regional or multi-region workloads.
- TLS termination
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit DigitalOcean
Internetport Managed Load Balancer Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to Internetport Managed Load Balancer?
AWS Elastic Load Balancing: #1 in our Load Balancer Services ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. A broad AWS-native load balancing service with usage-based pricing and multiple traffic layers.
Is there a free alternative to Internetport Managed Load Balancer?
Yes. Traefik Proxy and Envoy Proxy have a free plan or a free tier.
What is the cheapest paid alternative to Internetport Managed Load Balancer?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, DigitalOcean Load Balancers starts lowest, at $15/mo.
Why do people look for Internetport Managed Load Balancer alternatives?
Platform coverage is limited to the web; Backend target limit is 25; Pricing is shown excluding VAT.
Which Internetport Managed Load Balancer alternative has the most backend target limit?
Azure Application Gateway, with 1200.
How do I switch from Internetport Managed Load Balancer?
Export your data from Internetport Managed Load Balancer (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Internetport Managed Load Balancer.
How to Switch from Internetport Managed Load Balancer
- Export your data from Internetport Managed Load Balancer (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Internetport Managed Load Balancer.
Internetport Managed Load Balancer vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | TLS termination | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | Internetport Managed Load Balancer | No | €7.92/mo | Yes | 6.3 |
| 1 | AWS Elastic Load Balancing | No | Yes | 9.4 | |
| 2 | Google Cloud Load Balancing | $0.01/unit usage-based | Yes | 9.2 | |
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud Server Load Balancer | No | $0.007/unit usage-based | Yes | 9.0 |
| 4 | NGINX Plus | No | Yes | 8.8 | |
| 5 | HAProxy Enterprise | No | Yes | 8.7 | |
| 6 | Traefik Proxy | Yes | Free | Yes | 8.6 |
| 7 | Envoy Proxy | Yes | Free | Yes | 8.5 |
| 8 | F5 Distributed Cloud Load Balancing | No | Yes | 8.4 | |
| 9 | Azure Application Gateway | No | Yes | 8.3 | |
| 10 | Huawei Cloud Elastic Load Balance | No | Yes | 8.2 | |
| 11 | Tencent Cloud CLB | No | Yes | 8.1 | |
| 12 | Azure Front Door | No | $35/unit/mo | 8.0 | |
| 13 | Loadbalancer.org Enterprise | No | $150/mo | Yes | 7.9 |
| 14 | IBM Cloud Load Balancer | No | Yes | 7.8 | |
| 15 | DigitalOcean Load Balancers | No | $15/mo | Yes | 7.7 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update