Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Galene review

A free, self-hosted conferencing system with broad controls but no end-to-end encryption.

6.9/10Editor score
Galene6.9 Visit Galene

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Galene is a low-resource, open-source videoconferencing system made up of a web client and server. It is designed for administrators who want free, self-hosted conferencing for lectures, conferences, seminars, tutorials, staff meetings, and similar sessions. Participants can join through desktop and mobile browsers, while a separate Android client supports selected capabilities. Supported platforms include web, Windows, Android, iOS, and a self-hosted server.

Its feature set covers the core needs of managed online meetings: audio and video conferencing, text chat, screen and window sharing, recording to disk, group moderation, peer-to-peer file transfer, background blur, and a built-in TURN server. Administrators also get an HTTP API for groups and users, plus password- and token-based authorization. LDAP and OAuth2 support can fit existing identity workflows, while OBS Studio, SIP, and WHIP integrations extend its place in streaming and communications setups. Local recording and self-hosting give administrators direct control over where the service and recordings run.

Galene is a strong fit when ownership, open-source access, and administrative control matter more than a hosted service model. It is less suitable for organizations that require end-to-end encrypted meetings: media is decrypted by the server and reencrypted to clients. Teams should also account for the responsibility of operating the server and managing locally stored recordings. Choose Galene for self-managed conferencing with moderation, authorization, and integration options; consider an alternative when server-side media processing conflicts with security requirements or when a fully hosted workflow is preferred.

Galene pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free and open-source with self-hosting support
    • Recording, moderation, authorization, and file transfer included
    • LDAP, OAuth2, OBS Studio, SIP, and WHIP integrations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Media is decrypted by the server and reencrypted to clients
    • Recording is stored locally rather than through hosted storage
    • Android access is available for selected capabilities

Galene fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update