disk-mark-me
disk-mark-me: A focused Unix disk benchmarker with CrystalDiskMark-like profiles and IOPS reporting. Ranked #17 of 29 in Disk Benchmark Software by our editors (6.6/10); pricing: Free plan; best for crystalDiskMark-style Unix testing.
At a glance
- Editor score6.6 / 10
- PricingFree plan
- Best forCrystalDiskMark-style Unix testing
- Free planYes
- Paid fromFree
- Random I/O testsYes
- Facts checked20 Sep 2026
Where it wins
- Measures sequential and random read/write performance
- Reports throughput in MB/s and IOPS
- Supports configurable tests, verbose output, and cache clearing
Where it doesn't
- macOS support is described as beta
- Uses a command-line shell script interface
- Does not provide verified latency reporting
Our verdict on disk-mark-me
disk-mark-me is an open-source command-line shell script for benchmarking storage devices with fio. It targets Linux systems, including embedded gaming devices, and provides beta support for macOS. The tool is suited to users who want CrystalDiskMark-like sequential and random read/write tests from a Unix command line, with results presented in a familiar format.
Its testing controls are broader than a fixed preset runner. Users can choose a target directory, test-file size, benchmark rounds, and read/write selection. The script reports throughput in MB/s and input/output operations per second, while verbose per-round output gives more detail about each run. Prerequisite and disk-space checks add practical safeguards, and disk-cache clearing is available before read tests when permitted. These controls make disk-mark-me a useful fit for repeatable storage comparisons and targeted checks across different directories or devices.
The main trade-off is scope. disk-mark-me focuses on throughput and IOPS rather than presenting a verified latency view, so it is less suitable for buyers whose primary requirement is latency analysis. Its shell-script and command-line design also favors technically comfortable users over people seeking a graphical workflow. Choose it for free, open-source sequential and random storage benchmarks on Linux, or for evaluating the beta macOS support. Choose an alternative when a graphical interface, mature macOS support, or latency reporting is central to the decision.
Your product? Our editors can test disk-mark-me in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →
disk-mark-me pricing
disk-mark-me fact sheet
| Free plan | Yes |
|---|---|
| Paid from | Free |
| Random I/O tests | Yes |
| Sequential tests | Yes |
| IOPS measurement | Yes |
| Latency measurement | Not verified |
| Supported platforms | Linux, macOS |
| Command-line interface | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS |
| Support | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business (editorial estimate) |
| Pricing | Free plan |
| Website | github.com |
| Facts checked | 20 Sep 2026 |
Alternatives to disk-mark-me
- CrystalDiskMarkA configurable Windows disk benchmark with detailed speed, IOPS, and latency results.9.0
- fioA free, open-source benchmark for detailed storage and filesystem performance analysis.8.8
- HD Tune ProA capable Windows drive benchmark and diagnostic utility with a one-time license.8.5
See all disk-mark-me alternatives →
Used disk-mark-me? Be the first to review it
The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used disk-mark-me for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.
Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears
Featured on iTechGuides
disk-mark-me is listed in our Disk Benchmark Software directory. Add the badge to your site — it links back to this page.
<a href="https://www.itechguides.com/products/disk-mark-me/"><img src="https://www.itechguides.com/best/badge/disk-mark-me.svg" alt="Featured on iTechGuides" width="230" height="46"></a>
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update