Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

disk-mark-me review

Free#17 of 29 in Disk Benchmark Software

A focused Unix disk benchmarker with CrystalDiskMark-like profiles and IOPS reporting.

6.6/10Editor score
disk-mark-me6.6 Visit disk-mark-me

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

disk-mark-me is an open-source command-line shell script for benchmarking storage devices with fio. It targets Linux systems, including embedded gaming devices, and provides beta support for macOS. The tool is suited to users who want CrystalDiskMark-like sequential and random read/write tests from a Unix command line, with results presented in a familiar format.

Its testing controls are broader than a fixed preset runner. Users can choose a target directory, test-file size, benchmark rounds, and read/write selection. The script reports throughput in MB/s and input/output operations per second, while verbose per-round output gives more detail about each run. Prerequisite and disk-space checks add practical safeguards, and disk-cache clearing is available before read tests when permitted. These controls make disk-mark-me a useful fit for repeatable storage comparisons and targeted checks across different directories or devices.

The main trade-off is scope. disk-mark-me focuses on throughput and IOPS rather than presenting a verified latency view, so it is less suitable for buyers whose primary requirement is latency analysis. Its shell-script and command-line design also favors technically comfortable users over people seeking a graphical workflow. Choose it for free, open-source sequential and random storage benchmarks on Linux, or for evaluating the beta macOS support. Choose an alternative when a graphical interface, mature macOS support, or latency reporting is central to the decision.

disk-mark-me pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Measures sequential and random read/write performance
    • Reports throughput in MB/s and IOPS
    • Supports configurable tests, verbose output, and cache clearing
  • Where it doesn't
    • macOS support is described as beta
    • Uses a command-line shell script interface
    • Does not provide verified latency reporting

disk-mark-me fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update