Best AJA System Test Alternatives in 2026
The top AJA System Test alternatives are Geekbench, PassMark PerformanceTest and 3DMark: 15 PC benchmark software our editors would look at instead of AJA System Test, in our ranking order.
AJA System Test: A focused, free benchmark for storage throughput and video-production workflows. Where it falls short: its focus is mainly storage, disk throughput, and video workflows.
Switching from AJA System Test? For most pc benchmark software buyers the best AJA System Test alternative is Geekbench, built for cross-platform CPU and GPU benchmarking.
Why People Look for an AJA System Test Alternative
- Its focus is mainly storage, disk throughput, and video workflows
- System Test Lite is available as a standalone version for macOS
- PCIe bandwidth testing is provided in the full version
- No comparison database — 8 of the alternatives below have it
- No cLI or automation — 5 of the alternatives below have it
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallGeekbench9.3
Cross-platform CPU and GPU benchmarking
Visit Geekbench - Best free optionGeekbench9.3
Has a free plan
Visit Geekbench - Best for comparison databaseGeekbench9.3
Comparison database (AJA System Test: no)
Visit Geekbench
All 15 AJA System Test Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forCross-platform CPU and GPU benchmarking
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- CLI or automation
- Editor score 9.3 vs 4.0
A broad benchmark suite for comparing CPU and GPU performance across five platforms.
- Comparison database
- CLI or automation
9.3/10★★★★★Visit Geekbench -
Best forBroad PC performance comparisons
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- CLI or automation
- Editor score 9.1 vs 4.0
A broad benchmark suite with free standard tests and a $39 one-time advanced tier.
- Comparison database
- Custom test profiles
- CLI or automation
9.1/10★★★★★Visit PassMark -
Best forGaming and graphics performance testing
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- Editor score 9.1 vs 4.0
A broad benchmark suite for comparing GPU, CPU, storage, and gaming performance.
- Comparison database
- Custom test profiles
9.1/10★★★★★Visit 3DMark -
Best forWindows productivity and system benchmarking
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- CLI or automation
- Editor score 8.8 vs 4.0
A broad Windows benchmark suite with a useful free tier and paid automation features.
- Comparison database
- Custom test profiles
- CLI or automation
8.8/10★★★★☆Visit UL Solutions -
Best forProfessional application graphics benchmarking
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Editor score 8.7 vs 4.0
A configurable Windows benchmark for comparing professional application graphics performance.
8.7/10★★★★☆Visit SPECviewperf -
Best forFree GPU rendering comparisons
- Better than AJA System Test:
- CLI or automation
- Editor score 8.6 vs 4.0
A free, flexible rendering benchmark for comparing GPU, CPU, and hybrid performance.
- Custom test profiles
- CLI or automation
8.6/10★★★★☆Visit LuxMark -
Best forDeveloper performance bottleneck analysis
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Editor score 8.4 vs 4.0
A free profiler for finding application bottlenecks, not standardized PC benchmark scores.
8.4/10★★★★☆Visit Intel VTune -
Best forFree in-game FPS, latency, and power monitoring
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Editor score 8.3 vs 4.0
A focused free tool for tracking in-game FPS, latency, hardware telemetry, and power.
8.3/10★★★★☆Visit NVIDIA -
Best forOrganizations benchmarking Creo workstation performance
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- Editor score 8.1 vs 4.0
A Creo 9-specific benchmark with eight workflows and reference-machine score normalization.
- Comparison database
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit SPEC -
Best forSiemens NX viewport and model-workflow testing
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- Editor score 8.0 vs 4.0
A focused NX benchmark for viewport, model, export, and calculation workloads.
- Comparison database
- Custom test profiles
8.0/10★★★★☆Visit SPEC -
Best forSolidWorks graphics and CPU workflow testing
- Better than AJA System Test:
- CLI or automation
- Editor score 7.9 vs 4.0
A focused Solidworks 2025 benchmark with broad graphics and CPU workload coverage.
- CLI or automation
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit SPEC -
Best forMaya graphics, animation, and CPU ray tracing
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- Editor score 7.9 vs 4.0
A focused Maya 2024 benchmark for graphics, animation, and CPU ray tracing on Windows.
- Comparison database
- Custom test profiles
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit SPEC -
Best for3ds Max CPU, GPU, and visual-effects testing
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 4.0
A focused 3ds Max 2020 benchmark for CPU, GPU, modeling, graphics, and VFX workloads.
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit SPEC -
Best forBlackmagic RAW workflow testing
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Editor score 7.9 vs 4.0
A focused, free benchmark for measuring Blackmagic RAW decoding across desktop systems.
- Custom test profiles
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit site -
Best forWindows hardware diagnostics and benchmarks
- Better than AJA System Test:
- Comparison database
- Editor score 7.9 vs 4.0
A broad Windows toolkit for diagnosing, benchmarking, monitoring, and comparing PC systems.
- Comparison database
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit SiSoftware
AJA System Test Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to AJA System Test?
Geekbench: #1 in our PC Benchmark Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.3 out of 10. A broad benchmark suite for comparing CPU and GPU performance across five platforms.
Is there a free alternative to AJA System Test?
Yes. Geekbench, PassMark PerformanceTest, 3DMark, PCMark 10 and SPECviewperf have a free plan or a free tier (15 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
Why do people look for AJA System Test alternatives?
Its focus is mainly storage, disk throughput, and video workflows; System Test Lite is available as a standalone version for macOS; PCIe bandwidth testing is provided in the full version.
How do I switch from AJA System Test?
Export your data from AJA System Test (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel AJA System Test.
How to Switch from AJA System Test
- Export your data from AJA System Test (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel AJA System Test.
AJA System Test vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | Workload areas | Operating systems | Comparison database | Custom test profiles | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | AJA System Test | Yes | Free | Drive read/write performance and throughput; PCIe bandwidth; AJA-device DMA; combined disk and device I/O | macOS; Windows | No | Yes | 4.0 |
| 1 | Geekbench | Yes | CPU single-core and multi-core; GPU compute; machine learning; image processing; video editing; video conferencing; streaming; game physics | macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android | Yes | 9.3 | ||
| 2 | PassMark PerformanceTest | Yes | CPU, 2D graphics, 3D graphics, disk, memory, networking, visualized physics, GPU compute | Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, iOS | Yes | Yes | 9.1 | |
| 3 | 3DMark | Yes | GPU graphics, CPU, ray tracing, API performance, stability stress testing | Windows, Android, iOS | Yes | Yes | 9.1 | |
| 4 | PCMark 10 | Yes | Essentials, productivity, digital content creation, gaming, Microsoft Office applications, battery life, storage | Windows 7 64-bit minimum; Windows 10 and Windows 11 supported | Yes | Yes | 8.8 | |
| 5 | SPECviewperf | Yes | Free | 3D graphics rendering, CAD, digital content creation, professional visualization | Windows, Linux | 8.7 | ||
| 6 | LuxMark | Yes | Free | GPU rendering, CPU rendering, hybrid GPU+CPU rendering, CUDA, OptiX/RTX, path tracing, stress testing | Windows, macOS, Linux | Yes | 8.6 | |
| 7 | Intel VTune Profiler | Yes | Free | 8.4 | ||||
| 8 | NVIDIA FrameView | Yes | Free | 8.3 | ||||
| 9 | SPECapc for Creo 9 | Yes | $2,500 one-time | CPU performance, GPU and graphics performance, CPU rendering, IGES conversion, I/O performance | Windows 10 and Windows 11 64-bit | Yes | 8.1 | |
| 10 | SPECapc for Siemens NX 2024 | Yes | $2,500 one-time | Viewport graphics; model loading; model export; mass-property calculations; closest-point calculations | Microsoft Windows 10; Microsoft Windows 11 | Yes | Yes | 8.0 |
| 11 | SPECapc for Solidworks 2025 | Yes | $2,500 one-time | Graphics rendering, shaded display, hidden line removal, drawing mode, CPU rebuild, simulation, file conversion, Boolean operations, and Visualize CPU ray tracing | Microsoft Windows 10/11 64-bit | 7.9 | ||
| 12 | SPECapc for Maya 2024 | Yes | $2,500 one-time | graphics rendering, viewport modes, animation playback, 3D model rotation, CPU ray tracing, evaluation caching | Windows 10 or 11 64-bit | Yes | Yes | 7.9 |
| 13 | SPECapc for 3ds Max 2020 | Yes | $2,500 one-time | CPU; GPU; modeling; interactive graphics; visual effects | Microsoft Windows 10 64-bit | 7.9 | ||
| 14 | Blackmagic RAW Speed Test | Yes | Free | CPU decoding, GPU decoding, multiple CPU cores, multiple GPUs, resolution and frame-rate stress testing | macOS, Windows, Linux | Yes | 7.9 | |
| 15 | SiSoftware Sandra | Yes | CPU, memory, cache, graphics/GPGPU, storage, network/Internet, cryptography, software virtual machines | Windows; Android | Yes | 7.9 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update