Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Acta review

#49 of 81 in AI Meeting AssistantsMeeting Notes SoftwareMeeting Intelligence Software

A broad meeting-intelligence suite for teams that need more than summaries.

6.0/10Editor score
Acta6.0 Visit Acta

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Acta is an AI meeting assistant for teams that need structured outputs from conversations, not only recordings or summaries. It captures meetings and produces searchable transcripts, summaries, action items, key topics, decisions, and takeaways. Users can also search meeting history, ask questions about past discussions, edit transcripts and summaries, and create outputs such as Jira tickets and product requirements. Its role-specific AI agents and reports make it particularly relevant to sales, recruiting, engineering, project management, and other business functions.

The plan structure is centered on a 15-day Free offering, Pro, and Enterprise. The Free (15 days) tier includes unlimited recordings and transcriptions, limited AI summarization and action points, 600 minutes of storage, file upload, online recording, a mobile app, and a Chrome extension. Pro adds unlimited transcription, unlimited AI summaries and storage, downloads for transcripts, summaries, and recordings, talk-time analytics, and a follow-up center for action points. Enterprise adds on-premise deployment, white-label solutions, APIs, SSO, private storage, and custom data retention. This gives buyers a clear progression from evaluation to advanced administration and deployment.

Acta’s strongest distinction is the breadth of its meeting-intelligence layer. Analytics, role-specific agents, editable outputs, question answering, and workflow generation extend the product beyond basic meeting notes. It connects with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Teams calendar, and is available on web, iOS, Android, and Chrome. Teams should choose Acta when they need meeting information to feed follow-up work and function-specific processes. Organizations seeking a continuing free option, or a simpler assistant focused mainly on transcription and summaries, may find its paid structure and broader feature set less suitable.

Acta pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Searchable transcripts, summaries, action items, and meeting Q&A
    • Role-specific AI agents, reports, analytics, and workflow outputs
    • Web, iOS, Android, Chrome, Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams support
  • Where it doesn't
    • No ongoing free plan beyond the 15-day offering
    • Core meeting capture uses an Acta bot workflow
    • On-premise deployment, SSO, APIs, and private storage require Enterprise

Acta fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update