Head-to-head · Window Management Software
XMonad vs IceWM
XMonad leads on 0 checks, IceWM on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreXMonad · 9.0/10
- Free planonly XMonad
- Most featuresIceWM · 3 of 4
XMonad scores higher on our rubric for window management software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.
XMonad is the better fit for linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts. IceWM is the better fit for long-established Linux desktop users.
- XMonad fits best
Linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts
- IceWM fits best
Long-established Linux desktop users
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | XMonad 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | IceWM 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #5 in Window Management Software | #7 in Window Management Software |
| Best for | Linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts | Long-established Linux desktop users |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Linux | Linux |
| Features XMonad 2/4 · IceWM 3/4 | ||
| Layout presets | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Application rules | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Window grouping | ✓ | ✓ |
| Virtual desktop controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Platforms | linux | linux |
| Maximum displays | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | XMonad is a dynamically tiling window manager for X11, written and configured in Haskell. It is aimed at Linux users who want predictable, keyboard-driven control and are comfortable shaping their desktop through configuration. Windows can… Read the review → |
IceWM is a small, fast X11 window manager for Linux, distributed under the GNU LGPL. It is suited to solo users and small teams who want direct control over desktop windows rather than a full desktop environment. Keyboard and mouse… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
XMonad — where it wins
- Configurable Haskell layouts can vary by virtual workspace.
- Supports floating, tabbed, decorated, and automatically tiled windows.
- Reload configuration on the fly; extend it with xmonad-contrib.
Where it doesn't
- Configuration in Haskell is a poor fit for users who want a graphical editor.
- Designed for X11, not a general-purpose window manager across platforms.
- Multi-monitor support relies on Xinerama.
IceWM — where it wins
- Per-window rules control placement, size, layers, visibility, and workspaces
- Configurable workspaces, shortcuts, themes, and focus modes
- RandR and Xinerama support multi-monitor desktop setups
Where it doesn't
- Designed for X11 rather than a broader desktop environment
- Documentation is the listed support channel
- Its scope is window management, not a full desktop suite
- XMonad9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source Linux window manager for keyboard-driven, Haskell-configurable layouts.
Visit XMonadFull verdict → - IceWM8.8/10 · Open source
A focused Linux window manager with workspaces, rules, themes, and multi-monitor support.
Visit IceWMFull verdict →
More comparisons
- i3 vs XMonad
- i3 vs IceWM
- Sway vs XMonad
- Sway vs IceWM
- Hyprland vs XMonad
- Hyprland vs IceWM
- awesome vs XMonad
- awesome vs IceWM
All window management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



