Head-to-head · Window Management Software
awesome vs XMonad
awesome leads on 0 checks, XMonad on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreawesome · 9.1/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresawesome · 4 of 4
awesome scores higher on our rubric for window management software: 9.1 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.
awesome is the better fit for linux users who want Lua customization. XMonad is the better fit for linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts.
- awesome fits best
Linux users who want Lua customization
- XMonad fits best
Linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | awesome 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | XMonad 9.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 9.0 |
| Ranking | #4 in Window Management Software | #5 in Window Management Software |
| Best for | Linux users who want Lua customization | Linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Linux | Linux |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 6 integrations |
| Features awesome 4/4 · XMonad 2/4 | ||
| Layout presets | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Application rules | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Window grouping | ✓ | ✓ |
| Virtual desktop controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Platforms | linux | linux |
| Maximum displays | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | For Linux users who want control over how windows are arranged and managed, awesome is a free, open-source window manager for X. It combines tiling and floating layouts with keyboard-driven operation, multiple-screen support, and… Read the review → |
XMonad is a dynamically tiling window manager for X11, written and configured in Haskell. It is aimed at Linux users who want predictable, keyboard-driven control and are comfortable shaping their desktop through configuration. Windows can… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
awesome — where it wins
- Offers both tiling and floating layouts, with per-screen tags.
- Lua configuration supports application rules and fine-grained window control.
- Includes custom widgets, status bars, and D-Bus support.
Where it doesn't
- Designed for X, rather than a general-purpose desktop environment.
- Lua-based configuration may not suit users seeking a mostly graphical setup.
- The latest stable release listed by the project is version 4.3, dated 28 January 2019.
XMonad — where it wins
- Configurable Haskell layouts can vary by virtual workspace.
- Supports floating, tabbed, decorated, and automatically tiled windows.
- Reload configuration on the fly; extend it with xmonad-contrib.
Where it doesn't
- Configuration in Haskell is a poor fit for users who want a graphical editor.
- Designed for X11, not a general-purpose window manager across platforms.
- Multi-monitor support relies on Xinerama.
- awesome9.1/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source X window manager built for keyboard control and deep customization.
Visit awesomeFull verdict → - XMonad9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source Linux window manager for keyboard-driven, Haskell-configurable layouts.
Visit XMonadFull verdict →
More comparisons
- i3 vs awesome
- i3 vs XMonad
- Sway vs awesome
- Sway vs XMonad
- Hyprland vs awesome
- Hyprland vs XMonad
- awesome vs dwm
- awesome vs IceWM
All window management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



