Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Window Management Software

XMonad vs dwm

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score XMonad #5 in Window Management Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit XMonad
dwm #6 in Window Management Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit suckless.org

XMonad leads on 0 checks, dwm on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreXMonad · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresdwm · 3 of 4

XMonad scores higher on our rubric for window management software: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

XMonad is the better fit for linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts. dwm is the better fit for linux, OpenBSD, or Solaris users wanting tiling.

  • XMonad fits best

    Linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts

  • dwm fits best

    Linux, OpenBSD, or Solaris users wanting tiling

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature XMonad 9.0/10 Visit ↗ dwm 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #5 in Window Management Software #6 in Window Management Software
Best for Linux users wanting extensible Haskell layouts Linux, OpenBSD, or Solaris users wanting tiling
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Linux Linux
Integrations 6 integrations 3 integrations
Features XMonad 2/4 · dwm 3/4
Layout presets Not checked yet —
Application rules Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Window grouping ✓ ✓
Virtual desktop controls ✓ ✓
Specs
Platforms linux linux, openbsd, solaris
Maximum displays Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Configurable Haskell layouts can vary by virtual workspace.
  • Supports floating, tabbed, decorated, and automatically tiled windows.
  • Reload configuration on the fly; extend it with xmonad-contrib.
  • Offers tiled, monocle, and freely movable floating layouts
  • Uses tags, multi-tag views, and application-specific placement rules
  • Supports Xinerama and RandR multi-monitor controls
Cons
  • Configuration in Haskell is a poor fit for users who want a graphical editor.
  • Designed for X11, not a general-purpose window manager across platforms.
  • Multi-monitor support relies on Xinerama.
  • Configuration is compiled from source rather than changed in a settings interface
  • Focused on X window management rather than a broad desktop suite
  • Requires comfort building and customizing software
Our verdict

XMonad is a dynamically tiling window manager for X11, written and configured in Haskell. It is aimed at Linux users who want predictable, keyboard-driven control and are comfortable shaping their desktop through configuration. Windows can…

Read the review →

dwm is a lightweight dynamic window manager for the X Window System, aimed at Linux, OpenBSD, and Solaris users who want direct control over window placement. Its layouts cover tiled windows arranged in master and stacking areas, a monocle…

Read the review →
  1. XMonadWindow Management Software 9.0Free plan
  2. dwmWindow Management Software 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • XMonad — where it wins

    • Configurable Haskell layouts can vary by virtual workspace.
    • Supports floating, tabbed, decorated, and automatically tiled windows.
    • Reload configuration on the fly; extend it with xmonad-contrib.

    Where it doesn't

    • Configuration in Haskell is a poor fit for users who want a graphical editor.
    • Designed for X11, not a general-purpose window manager across platforms.
    • Multi-monitor support relies on Xinerama.
  • dwm — where it wins

    • Offers tiled, monocle, and freely movable floating layouts
    • Uses tags, multi-tag views, and application-specific placement rules
    • Supports Xinerama and RandR multi-monitor controls

    Where it doesn't

    • Configuration is compiled from source rather than changed in a settings interface
    • Focused on X window management rather than a broad desktop suite
    • Requires comfort building and customizing software

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update