Tabby vs Alacritty

Tabby9.4Visit Alacritty8.5Visit

Higher score Tabby #1 in Terminal Emulators 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Tabby

vs

Alacritty #8 in Terminal Emulators 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Alacritty

• Tabby fits best

  Power users needing SSH and extensive automation

• Alacritty fits best

  Minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Tabby 9.4/10 Visit ↗	Alacritty 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	8.5
Ranking	#1 in Terminal Emulators	#8 in Terminal Emulators
Best for	Power users needing SSH and extensive automation	Minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Desktop, Self-hosted	Desktop
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	Linux, macOS, Windows
Integrations	10 integrations	2 integrations
Features Tabby 5/5 · Alacritty 2/5
Split panes	✓ (best)	—
Session sync	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
GPU acceleration	✓	✓
Scripting API	✓	✓
SSH support	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	Linux, macOS, Windows, BSD
Our review
Pros	Integrated SSH includes jump hosts, forwarding, and connection management Nested split panes, GPU rendering, and extensive customization Documented TypeScript plugin API supports automation-focused extensions	GPU-accelerated OpenGL rendering across Linux, macOS, and Windows Search, Vi mode, regex hints, and mouse-based URL opening Live reload, multiple windows, and IPC control via alacritty msg
Cons	Session sync depends on a plugin using Gist or Gitee Its broad feature set may exceed simple local-shell needs The web application is available through self-hosting	No built-in split panes; pane layouts rely on external tools No built-in session synchronization Focused on terminal emulation rather than replacing shell tools
Our verdict	Tabby is an open-source terminal emulator for developers and system administrators who work across local shells, remote servers, serial connections, and Telnet. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, and also offers a self-hosted web… Read the review →	Alacritty is an open-source terminal emulator for people who work with command-line shells on Linux, macOS, Windows, and BSD. Its focus is a fast, configurable terminal experience that works with existing shells and terminal tools instead… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Tabby — where it wins

  • Integrated SSH includes jump hosts, forwarding, and connection management
  • Nested split panes, GPU rendering, and extensive customization
  • Documented TypeScript plugin API supports automation-focused extensions

  Where it doesn't

  • Session sync depends on a plugin using Gist or Gitee
  • Its broad feature set may exceed simple local-shell needs
  • The web application is available through self-hosting

• Alacritty — where it wins

  • GPU-accelerated OpenGL rendering across Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Search, Vi mode, regex hints, and mouse-based URL opening
  • Live reload, multiple windows, and IPC control via alacritty msg

  Where it doesn't

  • No built-in split panes; pane layouts rely on external tools
  • No built-in session synchronization
  • Focused on terminal emulation rather than replacing shell tools

• Tabby9.4/10 · Free plan

  A versatile open-source terminal for power users who automate across systems.

  Visit TabbyFull verdict →
• Alacritty8.5/10 · Free plan

  A focused, open-source terminal with GPU rendering and strong configuration options.

  Visit AlacrittyFull verdict →