Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Terminal Emulators

iTerm2 vs Alacritty

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score iTerm2 #3 in Terminal Emulators 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit iTerm2
Alacritty #8 in Terminal Emulators 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Alacritty

iTerm2 leads on 1 check, Alacritty on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreiTerm2 · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresiTerm2 · 4 of 5

iTerm2 scores higher on our rubric for terminal emulators: 9.2 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

iTerm2 offers split panes; Alacritty doesn't.

iTerm2 is the better fit for mac users wanting automation and rich session management. Alacritty is the better fit for minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering.

  • iTerm2 fits best

    Mac users wanting automation and rich session management

  • Alacritty fits best

    Minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature iTerm2 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Alacritty 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.5
Ranking #3 in Terminal Emulators #8 in Terminal Emulators
Best for Mac users wanting automation and rich session management Minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms macOS Linux, macOS, Windows
Integrations 3 integrations 2 integrations
Features iTerm2 4/5 · Alacritty 2/5
Split panes ✓ (best) —
Session sync Not checked yet Not checked yet
GPU acceleration ✓ ✓
Scripting API ✓ ✓
SSH support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms macos Linux, macOS, Windows, BSD
Our review
Pros
  • Tabbed windows, split panes, profiles, and saved session arrangements
  • GPU-accelerated rendering with inline image display
  • Python scripting API, RPC automation, SSH workflows, and tmux integration
  • GPU-accelerated OpenGL rendering across Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Search, Vi mode, regex hints, and mouse-based URL opening
  • Live reload, multiple windows, and IPC control via alacritty msg
Cons
  • Supports macOS rather than multiple desktop operating systems
  • Automation features may require Python or RPC scripting knowledge
  • Its focus is terminal work, not broader developer collaboration tools
  • No built-in split panes; pane layouts rely on external tools
  • No built-in session synchronization
  • Focused on terminal emulation rather than replacing shell tools
Our verdict

iTerm2 is a free, open-source terminal emulator for macOS and a replacement for Apple’s Terminal. It is aimed at Mac users who want more control over terminal layouts, shell sessions, remote workflows, and automation. The feature set…

Read the review →

Alacritty is an open-source terminal emulator for people who work with command-line shells on Linux, macOS, Windows, and BSD. Its focus is a fast, configurable terminal experience that works with existing shells and terminal tools instead…

Read the review →
  1. iTerm2Terminal Emulators 9.2Free plan
  2. AlacrittyTerminal Emulators 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • iTerm2 — where it wins

    • Tabbed windows, split panes, profiles, and saved session arrangements
    • GPU-accelerated rendering with inline image display
    • Python scripting API, RPC automation, SSH workflows, and tmux integration

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports macOS rather than multiple desktop operating systems
    • Automation features may require Python or RPC scripting knowledge
    • Its focus is terminal work, not broader developer collaboration tools
  • Alacritty — where it wins

    • GPU-accelerated OpenGL rendering across Linux, macOS, and Windows
    • Search, Vi mode, regex hints, and mouse-based URL opening
    • Live reload, multiple windows, and IPC control via alacritty msg

    Where it doesn't

    • No built-in split panes; pane layouts rely on external tools
    • No built-in session synchronization
    • Focused on terminal emulation rather than replacing shell tools

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update