Head-to-head · Terminal Emulators
Tabby vs Windows Terminal
Tabby leads on 0 checks, Windows Terminal on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreTabby · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresTabby · 5 of 5
Tabby scores higher on our rubric for terminal emulators: 9.4 against 9.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.
Tabby is the better fit for power users needing SSH and extensive automation. Windows Terminal is the better fit for windows users with multiple shell environments.
- Tabby fits best
Power users needing SSH and extensive automation
- Windows Terminal fits best
Windows users with multiple shell environments
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Tabby 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Windows Terminal 9.3/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Ranking | #1 in Terminal Emulators | #2 in Terminal Emulators |
| Best for | Power users needing SSH and extensive automation | Windows users with multiple shell environments |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop, Self-hosted | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Integrations | 10 integrations | 6 integrations |
| Features Tabby 5/5 · Windows Terminal 4/5 | ||
| Split panes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Session sync | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| GPU acceleration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scripting API | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSH support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Tabby is an open-source terminal emulator for developers and system administrators who work across local shells, remote servers, serial connections, and Telnet. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, and also offers a self-hosted web… Read the review → |
Windows Terminal is Microsoft’s open-source terminal application for running command-line shells and applications on Windows. It is aimed at users who move between PowerShell, Command Prompt, Windows Subsystem for Linux distributions,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Tabby — where it wins
- Integrated SSH includes jump hosts, forwarding, and connection management
- Nested split panes, GPU rendering, and extensive customization
- Documented TypeScript plugin API supports automation-focused extensions
Where it doesn't
- Session sync depends on a plugin using Gist or Gitee
- Its broad feature set may exceed simple local-shell needs
- The web application is available through self-hosting
Windows Terminal — where it wins
- Hosts PowerShell, Command Prompt, WSL, Git Bash, and Azure Cloud Shell
- Tabs, split panes, profiles, themes, shortcuts, and customizable backgrounds
- GPU-accelerated rendering, SSH profiles, and wt.exe command-line automation
Where it doesn't
- Runs on Windows rather than across multiple operating systems
- Its value depends on working primarily with command-line tools
- Profile and layout customization may require workflow configuration
- Tabby9.4/10 · Free plan
A versatile open-source terminal for power users who automate across systems.
Visit TabbyFull verdict → - Windows Terminal9.3/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source Windows terminal with tabs, panes, profiles, and automation.
Visit MicrosoftFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Tabby vs iTerm2
- Tabby vs kitty
- Tabby vs Warp
- Tabby vs MobaXterm
- Tabby vs Alacritty
- Windows Terminal vs iTerm2
- Windows Terminal vs kitty
- Windows Terminal vs PuTTY
All terminal emulators comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





