Head-to-head · Systematic Review Software
Silvi vs Catchii
Silvi leads on 0 checks, Catchii on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSilvi · 7.7/10
- Free planboth
Silvi scores higher on our rubric for systematic review software: 7.7 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.
Silvi is the better fit for modern AI-assisted review teams. Catchii is the better fit for free teams needing complete screening.
- Silvi fits best
Modern AI-assisted review teams
- Catchii fits best
Free teams needing complete screening
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Silvi 7.7/10 Visit ↗ | Catchii 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.7 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #4 in Systematic Review Software | #6 in Systematic Review Software |
| Best for | Modern AI-assisted review teams | Free teams needing complete screening |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Browser extension | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, Chrome extension | Web |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Docs | Email, Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Enterprise | Solo, Small business |
| Features Silvi 3/4 · Catchii 3/4 | ||
| Reference deduplication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data extraction | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full-text storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Protocol support | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Blinded screening | Not published | Double |
| Collaborator limit | Not published | Not published |
| Review types | systematic review; meta-analysis; network meta-analysis | systematic review |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Silvi is a web-based platform for systematic reviews, living reviews, and meta-analysis. It is designed for universities, research institutions, and research teams that need to import studies, screen references, review full-text PDFs,… Read the review → |
Catchii is a web-based systematic review screening tool for researchers working with scientific literature. It supports importing references from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, OVID, CSV, and reference managers, then carries the workflow… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Silvi — where it wins
- Free Basic plan supports unlimited reviews and transparent data extraction
- AI-assisted screening and extraction speed evidence synthesis workflows
- Blinding, conflict resolution, and PRISMA outputs support team reviews
Where it doesn't
- AI features are listed on the €19-per-month Rapid plan
- PubMed integration and blinded collaboration start with Plus at €59 monthly
- Enterprise features such as SSO use a custom plan
Catchii — where it wins
- Free plan supports multiple users with no subscription fees or paid upgrades
- Covers screening, deduplication, extraction, exports, and PRISMA flowcharts
- Offline screening and Auto Reviewer support flexible literature workflows
Where it doesn't
- The platform is web-based, with no other platform listed
- AI assistance is focused on first-phase screening
- Data extraction is provided as free-text extraction
- Silvi7.7/10 · Free plan · paid from €19/mo
A capable AI-assisted review workspace with free access and paid collaboration features.
Visit SilviFull verdict → - Catchii6.9/10 · Free plan
A complete free workflow for screening, extraction, collaboration, and PRISMA reporting.
Visit CatchiiFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Covexe vs Silvi
- Covexe vs Catchii
- PICO Portal vs Silvi
- PICO Portal vs Catchii
- Rayyan vs Silvi
- Rayyan vs Catchii
- Silvi vs Parsifal
- Silvi vs ReviQ
All systematic review software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





