Head-to-head · Systematic Review Software
Covexe vs Catchii
Covexe leads on 1 check, Catchii on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCovexe · 9.8/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresCovexe · 4 of 4
Covexe scores higher on our rubric for systematic review software: 9.8 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.
Covexe offers protocol support; Catchii doesn't publish it.
Covexe is the better fit for full-featured reviews on a budget. Catchii is the better fit for free teams needing complete screening.
- Covexe fits best
Full-featured reviews on a budget
- Catchii fits best
Free teams needing complete screening
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Covexe 9.8/10 Visit ↗ | Catchii 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.8 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Systematic Review Software | #6 in Systematic Review Software |
| Best for | Full-featured reviews on a budget | Free teams needing complete screening |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business |
| Features Covexe 4/4 · Catchii 3/4 | ||
| Reference deduplication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data extraction | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full-text storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Protocol support | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Blinded screening | Double | Double |
| Collaborator limit | 5 users | Not published |
| Review types | systematic review, scoping review, network meta-analysis, diagnostic accuracy review, umbrella review, rapid review, narrative review | systematic review |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Covexe is browser-based software for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and applied statistics. It is suited to researchers conducting systematic, scoping, network meta-analysis, diagnostic accuracy, umbrella, rapid, or narrative reviews.… Read the review → |
Catchii is a web-based systematic review screening tool for researchers working with scientific literature. It supports importing references from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, OVID, CSV, and reference managers, then carries the workflow… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Covexe — where it wins
- Covers screening, extraction, appraisal, synthesis, GRADE, and PRISMA
- Free plan includes meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and 40+ statistics tools
- Pro supports AI extraction, AI screening, PDF storage, and five reviewers
Where it doesn't
- Runs as a web application rather than a desktop product
- Team and Institution plans add higher-cost or custom licensing
- Institution SAML/OIDC and SCIM features are planned
Catchii — where it wins
- Free plan supports multiple users with no subscription fees or paid upgrades
- Covers screening, deduplication, extraction, exports, and PRISMA flowcharts
- Offline screening and Auto Reviewer support flexible literature workflows
Where it doesn't
- The platform is web-based, with no other platform listed
- AI assistance is focused on first-phase screening
- Data extraction is provided as free-text extraction
- Covexe9.8/10 · Free plan · paid from $99/yr
A broad systematic-review workflow with substantial free and low-cost options.
Visit CovexeFull verdict → - Catchii6.9/10 · Free plan
A complete free workflow for screening, extraction, collaboration, and PRISMA reporting.
Visit CatchiiFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Covexe vs PICO Portal
- Covexe vs Rayyan
- Covexe vs Silvi
- Covexe vs Parsifal
- Covexe vs ReviQ
- Covexe vs DistillerSR
- PICO Portal vs Catchii
- Rayyan vs Catchii
All systematic review software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






