Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Systematic Review Software

Silvi vs Parsifal

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Silvi #4 in Systematic Review Software 7.7/10 Free plan · paid from €19/mo Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Silvi
Parsifal #5 in Systematic Review Software 7.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Parsifal

Silvi leads on 0 checks, Parsifal on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSilvi · 7.7/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresParsifal · 4 of 4

Silvi scores higher on our rubric for systematic review software: 7.7 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

Parsifal offers protocol support; Silvi doesn't publish it.

Silvi is the better fit for modern AI-assisted review teams. Parsifal is the better fit for open-source protocol-led reviews.

  • Silvi fits best

    Modern AI-assisted review teams

  • Parsifal fits best

    Open-source protocol-led reviews

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Silvi 7.7/10 Visit ↗ Parsifal 7.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 7.4
Ranking #4 in Systematic Review Software #5 in Systematic Review Software
Best for Modern AI-assisted review teams Open-source protocol-led reviews
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Browser extension Cloud
Platforms Web, Chrome extension Web
Support Email, Live chat, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 7 integrations 11 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Silvi 3/4 · Parsifal 4/4
Reference deduplication ✓ ✓
Data extraction ✓ ✓
Full-text storage ✓ ✓
Protocol support Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Blinded screening Not published None
Collaborator limit Not published Not published
Review types systematic review; meta-analysis; network meta-analysis systematic literature reviews
Our review
Pros
  • Free Basic plan supports unlimited reviews and transparent data extraction
  • AI-assisted screening and extraction speed evidence synthesis workflows
  • Blinding, conflict resolution, and PRISMA outputs support team reviews
  • Covers protocol planning, screening, quality assessment, and data extraction
  • Automates duplicate detection with DOI matching and title similarity
  • Connects with major research sources and supports citation snowballing
Cons
  • AI features are listed on the €19-per-month Rapid plan
  • PubMed integration and blinded collaboration start with Plus at €59 monthly
  • Enterprise features such as SSO use a custom plan
  • Blinded screening is identified as none
  • The platform is web-based rather than desktop software
  • PDF retrieval focuses on open-access papers
Our verdict

Silvi is a web-based platform for systematic reviews, living reviews, and meta-analysis. It is designed for universities, research institutions, and research teams that need to import studies, screen references, review full-text PDFs,…

Read the review →

Parsifal is a web-based platform for researchers conducting systematic literature reviews. It is designed for postgraduate researchers, professors, and research teams, with particular relevance to reviews in software engineering, health,…

Read the review →
  1. SilviSystematic Review Software 7.7Free plan · paid from €19/mo
  2. ParsifalSystematic Review Software 7.4Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Silvi — where it wins

    • Free Basic plan supports unlimited reviews and transparent data extraction
    • AI-assisted screening and extraction speed evidence synthesis workflows
    • Blinding, conflict resolution, and PRISMA outputs support team reviews

    Where it doesn't

    • AI features are listed on the €19-per-month Rapid plan
    • PubMed integration and blinded collaboration start with Plus at €59 monthly
    • Enterprise features such as SSO use a custom plan
  • Parsifal — where it wins

    • Covers protocol planning, screening, quality assessment, and data extraction
    • Automates duplicate detection with DOI matching and title similarity
    • Connects with major research sources and supports citation snowballing

    Where it doesn't

    • Blinded screening is identified as none
    • The platform is web-based rather than desktop software
    • PDF retrieval focuses on open-access papers
  • Silvi7.7/10 · Free plan · paid from €19/mo

    A capable AI-assisted review workspace with free access and paid collaboration features.

    Visit SilviFull verdict →
  • Parsifal7.4/10 · Free plan

    A free, open-source workspace for protocol-led systematic literature reviews.

    Visit ParsifalFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update