Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · SAST Tools

Semgrep Code vs GitHub CodeQL

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 8 checks side by side
Higher score Semgrep Code #1 in SAST Tools 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Semgrep Code
GitHub CodeQL #3 in SAST Tools 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit GitHub CodeQL

Semgrep Code leads on 1 check, GitHub CodeQL on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSemgrep Code · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth

Semgrep Code scores higher on our rubric for sast tools: 9.4 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Semgrep Code leads on languages supported: 35 versus 11.

Semgrep Code is the better fit for teams needing broad SAST integrations. GitHub CodeQL is the better fit for gitHub-centric development teams.

  • Semgrep Code fits best

    Teams needing broad SAST integrations

  • GitHub CodeQL fits best

    GitHub-centric development teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Semgrep Code 9.4/10 Visit ↗ GitHub CodeQL 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.0
Ranking #1 in SAST Tools #3 in SAST Tools
Best for Teams needing broad SAST integrations GitHub-centric development teams
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $30/user/mo $30/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Desktop
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 13 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Semgrep Code 5/5 · GitHub CodeQL 5/5
Pull request scans ✓ ✓
IDE support ✓ ✓
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
Custom security rules ✓ ✓
Automated fixes ✓ ✓
Specs
Analysis targets source code source code
Languages supported 35 (best) 11
Our review
Pros
  • Cross-file and cross-function taint analysis
  • GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, CI/CD, and IDE integrations
  • AI-assisted triage, remediation guidance, and fix suggestions
  • Semantic queries detect vulnerabilities and coding errors.
  • Pull-request, GitHub Actions, and external CI scanning.
  • Custom queries and SARIF support for tailored analysis.
Cons
  • Free Edition is limited to 10 repositories and 10 contributors
  • Teams starts at $30 per contributor per month
  • Enterprise pricing is custom
  • Private-repository scanning requires paid GitHub Code Security.
  • Paid pricing is based on unique active committers.
  • The feature set is centered on source-code analysis.
Our verdict

Semgrep Code is a static application security testing product for development and security teams. It analyzes source code with Semgrep’s Pro Engine and security rules to identify vulnerabilities, including issues that require cross-file…

Read the review →

GitHub CodeQL is a semantic static-analysis engine for finding security vulnerabilities, coding errors, and other issues in source code. It represents code as data and queries that representation, giving development and security teams a…

Read the review →
  1. Semgrep CodeSAST Tools 9.4Free plan
  2. GitHub CodeQLSAST Tools 9.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Semgrep Code — where it wins

    • Cross-file and cross-function taint analysis
    • GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, CI/CD, and IDE integrations
    • AI-assisted triage, remediation guidance, and fix suggestions

    Where it doesn't

    • Free Edition is limited to 10 repositories and 10 contributors
    • Teams starts at $30 per contributor per month
    • Enterprise pricing is custom
  • GitHub CodeQL — where it wins

    • Semantic queries detect vulnerabilities and coding errors.
    • Pull-request, GitHub Actions, and external CI scanning.
    • Custom queries and SARIF support for tailored analysis.

    Where it doesn't

    • Private-repository scanning requires paid GitHub Code Security.
    • Paid pricing is based on unique active committers.
    • The feature set is centered on source-code analysis.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update