The Best SAST Tools in 2026

• 26 tools ranked
• Updated Oct 2026
• Researched from official sources
• Compare tools in this directory
• Sponsor this list

We researched SAST tools from official websites, including pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. Rankings reflect each product’s core static-analysis job, value for money and verified features such as language coverage, developer workflows and vulnerability remediation.

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

The full ranking 26 tools, best first

1. 1
   
   Semgrep Code 9.4

   Best forTeams needing broad SAST integrations

   Broad SAST coverage with pull-request, CI/CD, IDE, custom-rule, and AI-assisted workflows.

   • Automated fixes
   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support

   Free plan Our Semgrep Code verdict → + Compare Visit Semgrep CodeFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #1 · $149/mo →
   9.4/10★★★★★

   Visit Semgrep Code
2. 2
   
   Snyk Code 9.2

   Best forTeams wanting affordable SAST with fixes

   Affordable source-code SAST with pull-request, IDE, CI/CD, and automated-fix workflows.

   • Automated fixes
   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support

   Free plan Our Snyk Code verdict → + Compare Visit Snyk CodeFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #2 · $99/mo →
   9.2/10★★★★★

   Visit Snyk Code
3. 3
   
   GitHub CodeQL 9.0

   Best forGitHub-centric development teams

   Deep SAST for GitHub workflows, with free public-repository scanning.

   • Automated fixes
   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support

   Free plan Our GitHub CodeQL verdict → + Compare Visit GitHub CodeQLFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #3 · $79/mo →
   9.0/10★★★★☆

   Visit GitHub CodeQL
4. 4
   OF
   OpenText Fortify SAST 8.8

   Best forLarge enterprises needing broad analysis

   Broad SAST coverage for enterprises, with sales-led pricing and extensive workflow integrations.

   • Automated fixes
   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support

   Pricing on request Our OpenText Fortify SAST verdict → + Compare Visit OpenTextFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #4 · $69/mo →
   8.8/10★★★★☆

   Visit OpenText
5. 5
   
   Veracode Static Analysis 8.7

   Best forEnterprises scanning source and binaries

   A broad enterprise SAST service covering source, binaries, bytecode, and hybrid targets.

   • Automated fixes
   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support

   Pricing on request Our Veracode Static Analysis verdict → + Compare Visit VeracodeFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #5 · $59/mo →
   8.7/10★★★★☆

   Visit Veracode
6. 6
   
   Klocwork 8.5

   Best forEmbedded and enterprise engineering teams

   A broad SAST and code-analysis platform for embedded and enterprise engineering teams.

   • Automated fixes
   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support

   Pricing on request Our Klocwork verdict → + Compare Visit Klocwork
   8.5/10★★★★☆

   Visit Klocwork
7. 7
   
   CodeSonar 8.4

   Best forDeep analysis of mixed code and binaries

   A deep SAST option for mixed code and binaries, with enterprise workflow integrations.

   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support
   • Custom security rules

   Pricing on request Our CodeSonar verdict → + Compare Visit CodeSonar
   8.4/10★★★★☆

   Visit CodeSonar
8. 8
   
   DerScanner 8.3

   Best forTeams needing a broad AppSec platform

   A broad AppSec platform for teams combining SAST, DAST, SCA, mobile, and binary analysis.

   • Automated fixes
   • IDE support
   • Custom security rules

   Pricing on request Our DerScanner verdict → + Compare Visit DerScanner
   8.3/10★★★★☆

   Visit DerScanner
9. 9
   
   PVS-Studio 8.2

   Best forC/C++ and multi-language quality teams

   A broad SAST platform for C/C++ teams that also supports five other languages.

   • Pull request scans
   • IDE support
   • Custom security rules

   Pricing on request · 7-day trial Our PVS-Studio verdict → + Compare Visit PVS-Studio
   8.2/10★★★★☆

   Visit PVS-Studio
10. 10
    
    Checkmarx One 8.1

    Best forEnterprise security programs

    Enterprise SAST with broad integrations, custom queries, centralized triage, and AI guidance.

    • Automated fixes
    • Pull request scans
    • IDE support

    Pricing on request Our Checkmarx One verdict → + Compare Visit Checkmarx
    8.1/10★★★★☆

    Visit Checkmarx
11. 11
    
    NaiveSystems Analyze 8.0

    Best forTeams enforcing MISRA and CERT compliance

    A focused C/C++ SAST tool for standards-driven engineering teams.

    • IDE support
    • Custom security rules

    Free plan Our NaiveSystems Analyze verdict → + Compare Visit NaiveSystems
    8.0/10★★★★☆

    Visit NaiveSystems
12. 12
    M
    MobSF 7.9

    Best forMobile application security teams

    A broad open-source framework for static and dynamic mobile application security analysis.

    • Pull request scans

    Free plan Our MobSF verdict → + Compare Visit MobSF
    7.9/10★★★★☆

    Visit MobSF
13. 13
    
    Bearer 7.8

    Best forOpen-source teams focused on privacy risks

    Open-source SAST with privacy detection, CI workflows, and AI remediation.

    • Pull request scans
    • Custom security rules

    Free plan Our Bearer verdict → + Compare Visit Bearer
    7.8/10★★★★☆

    Visit Bearer
14. 14
    
    Fluid Attacks 7.7

    Best forTeams wanting broad AppSec coverage

    A broad AppSec platform for teams that need SAST plus wider security coverage.

    • Automated fixes
    • Pull request scans
    • IDE support

    Pricing on request · 21-day trial Our Fluid Attacks verdict → + Compare Visit Fluid Attacks
    7.7/10★★★★☆

    Visit Fluid Attacks
15. 15
    
    Kiuwan Code Security 7.6

    Best forOrganizations wanting traditional SAST governance

    A governance-focused SAST product with broad analysis and reporting, priced for committed teams.

    • Automated fixes
    • Pull request scans
    • IDE support

    Our Kiuwan Code Security verdict → + Compare Visit Kiuwan
    7.6/10★★★★☆

    Visit Kiuwan
16. 16
    
    Joern 7.5

    Best forResearchers and advanced security analysts

    A flexible open-source SAST workbench for deep code and graph analysis.

    • Custom security rules

    Free plan Our Joern verdict → + Compare Visit Joern
    7.5/10★★★★☆

    Visit Joern
17. 17
    
    Qwiet AI 7.4

    Best forTeams prioritizing exploitable vulnerabilities

    Prioritizes exploitable code risks while extending scanning across the application stack.

    • Automated fixes
    • IDE support

    Pricing on request · 45-day trial Our Qwiet AI verdict → + Compare Visit Qwiet AI
    7.4/10★★★★☆

    Visit Qwiet AI
18. 18
    
    HCL AppScan Source 7.3

    Best forLarge teams needing compliance reporting

    A source-code SAST suite for large teams needing governance and compliance reporting.

    • IDE support
    • Custom security rules

    Pricing on request Our HCL AppScan Source verdict → + Compare Visit site
    7.3/10★★★★☆

    Visit site
19. 19
    SC
    Security Code Scan 7.2

    Best for.NET teams needing free taint analysis

    Free, open-source taint analysis for .NET teams with flexible CI and IDE options.

    • IDE support
    • Custom security rules

    Open source Our Security Code Scan verdict → + Compare Visit site
    7.2/10★★★★☆

    Visit site
20. 20
    N
    NodeJsScan 7.1

    Best forNode.js teams needing self-hosted scanning

    A focused open-source scanner for Node.js teams that need self-hosted SAST.

    • Pull request scans
    • Custom security rules

    Open source Our NodeJsScan verdict → + Compare Visit NodeJsScan
    7.1/10★★★★☆

    Visit NodeJsScan
21. 21
    B
    Bandit 7.0

    Best forPython teams needing lightweight SAST

    A focused, open-source SAST tool for Python teams that want configurable scanning.

    • IDE support
    • Custom security rules

    Free plan Our Bandit verdict → + Compare Visit Bandit
    7.0/10★★★★☆

    Visit Bandit
22. 22
    G
    gosec 6.9

    Best forGo teams needing free security analysis

    A focused, free SAST tool for Go with CI workflows, taint analysis, and flexible reporting.

    • Automated fixes
    • Pull request scans

    Free plan Our gosec verdict → + Compare Visit Gosec
    6.9/10★★★☆☆

    Visit Gosec
23. 23
    
    Coverity Static Analysis 6.8

    Best forRegulated teams needing broad SAST controls

    Broad language, framework, CI/CD, IDE, and deployment controls for regulated teams.

    • Automated fixes
    • Pull request scans
    • IDE support

    Pricing on request Our Coverity Static Analysis verdict → + Compare Visit Coverity
    6.8/10★★★☆☆

    Visit Coverity
24. 24
    
    Flawfinder 6.8

    Best forC/C++ teams needing simple free scanning

    A free, focused scanner for finding potential C/C++ security weaknesses.

    Free plan Our Flawfinder verdict → + Compare Visit Flawfinder
    6.8/10★★★☆☆

    Visit Flawfinder
25. 25
    
    Brakeman 6.7

    Best forRuby on Rails teams

    A Rails-focused SAST tool with configurable checks, CI automation, and editor findings.

    • IDE support
    • Custom security rules

    Our Brakeman verdict → + Compare Visit Brakeman
    6.7/10★★★☆☆

    Visit Brakeman
26. 26
    
    ZeroPath 6.6

    Best forTeams wanting AI-native SAST and AppSec

    A broad AI-native AppSec platform with strong detection and a high paid entry point.

    • Automated fixes
    • Pull request scans
    • Custom security rules

    Our ZeroPath verdict → + Compare Visit ZeroPath
    6.6/10★★★☆☆

    Visit ZeroPath

No tools match those filters.

Compare at a glance

#	Tool	Free plan	Paid from	Analysis targets	Pull request scans	Custom security rules	Score
1	Semgrep Code	Yes	$30/user/mo	source code	Yes	Yes	9.4
2	Snyk Code	Yes	$25/user/mo	source code	Yes	Yes	9.2
3	GitHub CodeQL	Yes	$30/user/mo	source code	Yes	Yes	9.0
4	OFOpenText Fortify SAST			source code, bytecode, binaries	Yes	Yes	8.8
5	Veracode Static Analysis			source code, bytecode, binaries	Yes	Yes	8.7
6	Klocwork			source code	Yes	Yes	8.5
7	CodeSonar			source code, binaries	Yes	Yes	8.4
8	DerScanner			source code, bytecode, binaries		Yes	8.3
9	PVS-Studio	No		source code	Yes	Yes	8.2
10	Checkmarx One	No		source code	Yes	Yes	8.1
11	NaiveSystems Analyze	Yes		source code		Yes	8.0
12	MMobSF	Yes	Free	source code, binaries	Yes		7.9
13	Bearer	Yes	Free	source code	Yes	Yes	7.8
14	Fluid Attacks	No		source code	Yes	No	7.7
15	Kiuwan Code Security	No	$49/user/mo	source code	Yes	Yes	7.6
16	Joern	Yes	Free	source code, bytecode, binaries		Yes	7.5
17	Qwiet AI	No		source code and dependencies			7.4
18	HCL AppScan Source	No		source code		Yes	7.3
19	SCSecurity Code Scan		Free	source code		Yes	7.2
20	NNodeJsScan		Free	source code	Yes	Yes	7.1
21	BBandit	Yes	Free	source code		Yes	7.0
22	Ggosec	Yes	Free	source code	Yes		6.9
23	Coverity Static Analysis	No		source code	Yes	Yes	6.8
24	Flawfinder	Yes	Free	source code			6.8
25	Brakeman			source code		Yes	6.7
26	ZeroPath	No	$1,000/mo	source code	Yes	Yes	6.6

Head-to-head All 22 comparisons →

• Semgrep Code vs Snyk Code
• Semgrep Code vs GitHub CodeQL
• OFSemgrep Code vs OpenText Fortify SAST
• Semgrep Code vs Veracode Static Analysis
• Semgrep Code vs Klocwork
• Semgrep Code vs DerScanner
• Snyk Code vs GitHub CodeQL
• OFSnyk Code vs OpenText Fortify SAST
• Snyk Code vs Veracode Static Analysis

How we rank SAST tools

Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update