Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · SAST Tools

GitHub CodeQL vs OpenText Fortify SAST

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score GitHub CodeQL #3 in SAST Tools 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit GitHub CodeQL
OpenText Fortify SAST #4 in SAST Tools 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit OpenText

GitHub CodeQL leads on 0 checks, OpenText Fortify SAST on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGitHub CodeQL · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly GitHub CodeQL

GitHub CodeQL scores higher on our rubric for sast tools: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

GitHub CodeQL is the better fit for gitHub-centric development teams. OpenText Fortify SAST is the better fit for large enterprises needing broad analysis.

  • GitHub CodeQL fits best

    GitHub-centric development teams

  • OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

    Large enterprises needing broad analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature GitHub CodeQL 9.0/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Fortify SAST 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #3 in SAST Tools #4 in SAST Tools
Best for GitHub-centric development teams Large enterprises needing broad analysis
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $30/user/mo Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Phone, Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features GitHub CodeQL 5/5 · OpenText Fortify SAST 5/5
Pull request scans ✓ ✓
IDE support ✓ ✓
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
Custom security rules ✓ ✓
Automated fixes ✓ ✓
Specs
Analysis targets source code source code, bytecode, binaries
Languages supported 11 Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Semantic queries detect vulnerabilities and coding errors.
  • Pull-request, GitHub Actions, and external CI scanning.
  • Custom queries and SARIF support for tailored analysis.
  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries across 44+ languages and 350+ frameworks
  • Connects pull requests, IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and issue tracking
  • Adds IaC scanning, custom rules, dashboards, and AI remediation suggestions
Cons
  • Private-repository scanning requires paid GitHub Code Security.
  • Paid pricing is based on unique active committers.
  • The feature set is centered on source-code analysis.
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • The breadth may exceed the needs of smaller or narrowly focused teams
  • Deployment and governance options can require a structured security program
Our verdict

GitHub CodeQL is a semantic static-analysis engine for finding security vulnerabilities, coding errors, and other issues in source code. It represents code as data and queries that representation, giving development and security teams a…

Read the review →

OpenText Fortify SAST is a static application security testing platform for development and security teams. It analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries across web, mobile, desktop, cloud-native, API, container, and…

Read the review →
  1. GitHub CodeQLSAST Tools 9.0Free plan
  2. OpenText Fortify SASTSAST Tools 8.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • GitHub CodeQL — where it wins

    • Semantic queries detect vulnerabilities and coding errors.
    • Pull-request, GitHub Actions, and external CI scanning.
    • Custom queries and SARIF support for tailored analysis.

    Where it doesn't

    • Private-repository scanning requires paid GitHub Code Security.
    • Paid pricing is based on unique active committers.
    • The feature set is centered on source-code analysis.
  • OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries across 44+ languages and 350+ frameworks
    • Connects pull requests, IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and issue tracking
    • Adds IaC scanning, custom rules, dashboards, and AI remediation suggestions

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • The breadth may exceed the needs of smaller or narrowly focused teams
    • Deployment and governance options can require a structured security program

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update