Scapy vs Kismet

Scapy9.0Visit Kismet8.9Visit

Higher score Scapy #3 in Network Protocol Analyzers 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Scapy

vs

Kismet #4 in Network Protocol Analyzers 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Kismet

• Scapy fits best

  Programmable packet crafting and analysis

• Kismet fits best

  Wireless packet capture and monitoring

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Scapy 9.0/10 Visit ↗	Kismet 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.0	8.9
Ranking	#3 in Network Protocol Analyzers	#4 in Network Protocol Analyzers
Best for	Programmable packet crafting and analysis	Wireless packet capture and monitoring
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Desktop, Self-hosted	Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms	Windows, macOS, Linux	Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Docs	Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Scapy 5/5 · Kismet 5/5
PCAP support	✓	✓
Traffic decryption	✓	✓
CLI tools	✓	✓
Remote capture	✓	✓
Flow analysis	✓	✓
Specs
Deployment	Both	Both
Capture sources	Both	Both
Our review
Pros	Build and send custom packets with Python or the interactive shell. Decode protocols and import or export PCAP files. Analyze flows and support remote capture through Wireshark extcap.	Captures Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee, RF, and supported sensor traffic Supports remote sensors, PCAP workflows, APIs, and command-line tools Combines device tracking, WIDS alerts, logging, and trend monitoring
Cons	Its workflow centers on Python and an interactive shell. TLS decryption requires available session secrets. It is a toolkit, not a hosted SaaS service.	Windows support runs through WSL rather than a native capture stack Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams focused on one protocol Known-key decryption support depends on having the relevant key
Our verdict	Scapy is an open-source Python program and library for sending, sniffing, dissecting, forging, and analyzing network packets. It is aimed at users who need programmable control over packet construction and inspection rather than a fixed… Read the review →	Kismet is a free, open-source wireless monitoring and packet-capture tool for teams investigating Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, Zigbee, RF devices, and other supported protocols. It supports local interfaces and remote sensors,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Scapy — where it wins

  • Build and send custom packets with Python or the interactive shell.
  • Decode protocols and import or export PCAP files.
  • Analyze flows and support remote capture through Wireshark extcap.

  Where it doesn't

  • Its workflow centers on Python and an interactive shell.
  • TLS decryption requires available session secrets.
  • It is a toolkit, not a hosted SaaS service.

• Kismet — where it wins

  • Captures Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee, RF, and supported sensor traffic
  • Supports remote sensors, PCAP workflows, APIs, and command-line tools
  • Combines device tracking, WIDS alerts, logging, and trend monitoring

  Where it doesn't

  • Windows support runs through WSL rather than a native capture stack
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of teams focused on one protocol
  • Known-key decryption support depends on having the relevant key

• Scapy9.0/10 · Free plan

  A free, programmable toolkit for crafting, capturing, decoding, and analyzing packets.

  Visit ScapyFull verdict →
• Kismet8.9/10 · Free plan

  A flexible, free toolkit for wireless capture, monitoring, analysis, and distributed sensors.

  Visit KismetFull verdict →