Head-to-head · Network Protocol Analyzers
Wireshark vs Scapy
Wireshark leads on 0 checks, Scapy on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreWireshark · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
Wireshark scores higher on our rubric for network protocol analyzers: 9.4 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.
On deployment, Scapy gives you Both where Wireshark offers Desktop.
Wireshark is the better fit for broad, free desktop packet analysis. Scapy is the better fit for programmable packet crafting and analysis.
- Wireshark fits best
Broad, free desktop packet analysis
- Scapy fits best
Programmable packet crafting and analysis
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Wireshark 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Scapy 9.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Ranking | #1 in Network Protocol Analyzers | #3 in Network Protocol Analyzers |
| Best for | Broad, free desktop packet analysis | Programmable packet crafting and analysis |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Community, Docs | Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Wireshark 5/5 · Scapy 5/5 | ||
| PCAP support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traffic decryption | ✓ | ✓ |
| CLI tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remote capture | ✓ | ✓ |
| Flow analysis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment | Desktop | Both |
| Capture sources | Both | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Wireshark is an open-source network protocol analyzer for capturing, browsing, filtering, and inspecting network traffic. It is designed for network professionals, security experts, developers, and educators who need to examine live… Read the review → |
Scapy is an open-source Python program and library for sending, sniffing, dissecting, forging, and analyzing network packets. It is aimed at users who need programmable control over packet construction and inspection rather than a fixed… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Wireshark — where it wins
- Live capture and offline analysis support
- Deep inspection, filtering, decryption, and PCAP support
- Includes TShark and remote capture over SSH
Where it doesn't
- Desktop deployment may not fit hosted or browser-based workflows
- Remote capture is provided through SSH
- Its extensive feature set is focused on technical packet analysis
Scapy — where it wins
- Build and send custom packets with Python or the interactive shell.
- Decode protocols and import or export PCAP files.
- Analyze flows and support remote capture through Wireshark extcap.
Where it doesn't
- Its workflow centers on Python and an interactive shell.
- TLS decryption requires available session secrets.
- It is a toolkit, not a hosted SaaS service.
- Wireshark9.4/10 · Free plan
A broad, free desktop analyzer for live captures, PCAP files, filtering, and protocol inspection.
Visit WiresharkFull verdict → - Scapy9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, programmable toolkit for crafting, capturing, decoding, and analyzing packets.
Visit ScapyFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Wireshark vs TShark
- Wireshark vs Kismet
- Wireshark vs tcpdump
- Wireshark vs Arkime
- Wireshark vs Ettercap
- Wireshark vs NetworkMiner
- TShark vs Scapy
- Scapy vs Kismet
All network protocol analyzers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







