Head-to-head · Network Protocol Analyzers
Scapy vs CloudShark
Scapy leads on 1 check, CloudShark on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreScapy · 9.0/10
- Free planonly Scapy
- Most featuresScapy · 5 of 5
Scapy scores higher on our rubric for network protocol analyzers: 9.0 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #16.
Scapy offers free plan; CloudShark doesn't. On deployment, Scapy gives you Both where CloudShark offers Server.
Scapy is the better fit for programmable packet crafting and analysis. CloudShark is the better fit for managed enterprise packet analysis.
- Scapy fits best
Programmable packet crafting and analysis
- CloudShark fits best
Managed enterprise packet analysis
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Scapy 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | CloudShark 7.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 7.6 |
| Ranking | #3 in Network Protocol Analyzers | #16 in Network Protocol Analyzers |
| Best for | Programmable packet crafting and analysis | Managed enterprise packet analysis |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | — |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop, Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web |
| Support | Docs | Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Scapy 5/5 · CloudShark 3/5 | ||
| PCAP support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traffic decryption | ✓ | ✓ |
| CLI tools | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Remote capture | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Flow analysis | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment | Both | Server |
| Capture sources | Both | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Scapy is an open-source Python program and library for sending, sniffing, dissecting, forging, and analyzing network packets. It is aimed at users who need programmable control over packet construction and inspection rather than a fixed… Read the review → |
CloudShark Enterprise is a self-hosted packet-capture analysis platform for network operations, security, and engineering teams. It runs through web and API interfaces, supports PCAP capture sources, and provides a browser-based packet… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Scapy — where it wins
- Build and send custom packets with Python or the interactive shell.
- Decode protocols and import or export PCAP files.
- Analyze flows and support remote capture through Wireshark extcap.
Where it doesn't
- Its workflow centers on Python and an interactive shell.
- TLS decryption requires available session secrets.
- It is a toolkit, not a hosted SaaS service.
CloudShark — where it wins
- Wireshark-compatible viewing with familiar display filters
- Deep search, large PCAP processing, and centralized capture analysis
- Zeek, Suricata, REST API, and enterprise integrations
Where it doesn't
- No free plan for smaller or exploratory deployments
- Enterprise pricing requires a sales conversation
- Self-hosted server deployment requires infrastructure management
- Scapy9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, programmable toolkit for crafting, capturing, decoding, and analyzing packets.
Visit ScapyFull verdict → - CloudShark7.6/10 · Pricing on request
Enterprise packet analysis with Wireshark compatibility, automation, and deep search.
Visit CloudSharkFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Wireshark vs Scapy
- TShark vs Scapy
- Scapy vs Kismet
- Scapy vs tcpdump
- Scapy vs Arkime
- Scapy vs Ettercap
- Scapy vs NetworkMiner
All network protocol analyzers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update








