Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Container Registries

Quay vs JFrog Container Registry

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Quay #2 in Container Registries 9.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Quay
JFrog Container Registry #6 in Container Registries 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit JFrog

Quay leads on 0 checks, JFrog Container Registry on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreQuay · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Quay
  • Most featuresQuay · 4 of 4

Quay scores higher on our rubric for container registries: 9.3 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Quay is the better fit for open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options. JFrog Container Registry is the better fit for organizations needing broad artifact repository support.

  • Quay fits best

    Open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options

  • JFrog Container Registry fits best

    Organizations needing broad artifact repository support

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Quay 9.3/10 Visit ↗ JFrog Container Registry 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.9
Ranking #2 in Container Registries #6 in Container Registries
Best for Open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options Organizations needing broad artifact repository support
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Free plan · 30-day trial —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Linux, Windows
Support Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs Docs, Community · 24/7
Integrations 5 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Quay 4/4 · JFrog Container Registry 3/4
Image scanning ✓ ✓
OCI artifacts ✓ ✓
Immutable tags ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Retention policies ✓ ✓
Specs
Replication scope Multi-region Multi-region
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum image size Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Automated vulnerability scanning with Clair
  • OCI 1.1 referrers, immutable tags, and retention policies
  • Mirroring and geo-replication for distributed repositories
  • Supports Docker, OCI, Helm, Helm OCI, and Generic repositories
  • Combines local, remote, and virtual repositories with caching
  • Includes RBAC, search, retention controls, and CI/CD integration
Cons
  • Project Quay and hosted Quay.io require a deployment choice
  • Advanced controls may exceed basic image-storage needs
  • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
  • The free edition is self-managed only
  • Paid plans start at $150 per month
  • Enterprise + uses custom pricing
Our verdict

Quay is a container registry for developers and organizations that build, store, organize, scan, and distribute container images and other OCI artifacts. It supports web and API access, as well as self-hosted deployment. Project Quay is…

Read the review →

JFrog Container Registry is a container registry built into JFrog Artifactory for storing, proxying, organizing, and distributing Docker and OCI images and Helm charts. It is suited to organizations that need more than basic image storage,…

Read the review →
  1. QuayContainer Registries 9.3Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. JFrog Container RegistryContainer Registries 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Quay — where it wins

    • Automated vulnerability scanning with Clair
    • OCI 1.1 referrers, immutable tags, and retention policies
    • Mirroring and geo-replication for distributed repositories

    Where it doesn't

    • Project Quay and hosted Quay.io require a deployment choice
    • Advanced controls may exceed basic image-storage needs
    • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
  • JFrog Container Registry — where it wins

    • Supports Docker, OCI, Helm, Helm OCI, and Generic repositories
    • Combines local, remote, and virtual repositories with caching
    • Includes RBAC, search, retention controls, and CI/CD integration

    Where it doesn't

    • The free edition is self-managed only
    • Paid plans start at $150 per month
    • Enterprise + uses custom pricing
  • Quay9.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A flexible registry for teams that need hosted convenience or self-hosted control.

    Visit QuayFull verdict →
  • JFrog Container Registry8.9/10 · Free plan

    A broad artifact registry with free self-managed access and paid cloud tiers.

    Visit JFrogFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update