Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Container Registries

Harbor vs Quay

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Harbor #1 in Container Registries 9.4/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Harbor
Quay #2 in Container Registries 9.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Quay

Harbor leads on 0 checks, Quay on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreHarbor · 9.4/10
  • Free planonly Quay
  • Free trialonly Quay

Harbor scores higher on our rubric for container registries: 9.4 against 9.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Harbor is the better fit for teams wanting a capable open-source registry. Quay is the better fit for open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options.

  • Harbor fits best

    Teams wanting a capable open-source registry

  • Quay fits best

    Open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Harbor 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Quay 9.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.3
Ranking #1 in Container Registries #2 in Container Registries
Best for Teams wanting a capable open-source registry Open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Open source Free plan · 30-day trial
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Harbor 4/4 · Quay 4/4
Image scanning ✓ ✓
OCI artifacts ✓ ✓
Immutable tags ✓ ✓
Retention policies ✓ ✓
Specs
Replication scope Not checked yet Multi-region
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum image size Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports OCI images, indexes, and other OCI artifacts
  • Combines scanning, signing, immutability, retention, and RBAC
  • Replicates with Harbor and other major registries
  • Automated vulnerability scanning with Clair
  • OCI 1.1 referrers, immutable tags, and retention policies
  • Mirroring and geo-replication for distributed repositories
Cons
  • Requires self-hosted deployment and ongoing administration
  • No AI features for AI-assisted registry workflows
  • Web and API access still depend on your hosting environment
  • Project Quay and hosted Quay.io require a deployment choice
  • Advanced controls may exceed basic image-storage needs
  • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
Our verdict

Harbor is a self-hosted, open-source container registry for organizations managing container images and cloud-native artifacts. It fits teams that want control over deployment and registry policies without a proprietary license. Projects…

Read the review →

Quay is a container registry for developers and organizations that build, store, organize, scan, and distribute container images and other OCI artifacts. It supports web and API access, as well as self-hosted deployment. Project Quay is…

Read the review →
  1. HarborContainer Registries 9.4Open source
  2. QuayContainer Registries 9.3Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Harbor — where it wins

    • Supports OCI images, indexes, and other OCI artifacts
    • Combines scanning, signing, immutability, retention, and RBAC
    • Replicates with Harbor and other major registries

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires self-hosted deployment and ongoing administration
    • No AI features for AI-assisted registry workflows
    • Web and API access still depend on your hosting environment
  • Quay — where it wins

    • Automated vulnerability scanning with Clair
    • OCI 1.1 referrers, immutable tags, and retention policies
    • Mirroring and geo-replication for distributed repositories

    Where it doesn't

    • Project Quay and hosted Quay.io require a deployment choice
    • Advanced controls may exceed basic image-storage needs
    • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
  • Harbor9.4/10 · Open source

    A self-hosted Harbor registry with strong policy, scanning, signing, and replication controls.

    Visit HarborFull verdict →
  • Quay9.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A flexible registry for teams that need hosted convenience or self-hosted control.

    Visit QuayFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update