Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Container Registries

Quay vs Angos

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Quay #2 in Container Registries 9.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Quay
Angos #5 in Container Registries 9.0/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Angos

Quay leads on 0 checks, Angos on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreQuay · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly Quay
  • Free trialonly Quay

Quay scores higher on our rubric for container registries: 9.3 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Quay is the better fit for open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options. Angos is the better fit for policy-driven open-source deployments.

  • Quay fits best

    Open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options

  • Angos fits best

    Policy-driven open-source deployments

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Quay 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Angos 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.0
Ranking #2 in Container Registries #5 in Container Registries
Best for Open-source teams needing hosted or self-hosted options Policy-driven open-source deployments
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price Free plan · 30-day trial Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Linux
Support Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Quay 4/4 · Angos 4/4
Image scanning ✓ ✓
OCI artifacts ✓ ✓
Immutable tags ✓ ✓
Retention policies ✓ ✓
Specs
Replication scope Multi-region Not checked yet
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum image size Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Automated vulnerability scanning with Clair
  • OCI 1.1 referrers, immutable tags, and retention policies
  • Mirroring and geo-replication for distributed repositories
  • CEL policies cover access control, retention, and pruning
  • Supports immutable tags, replication, and pull-through caching
  • Works with OIDC, mTLS, Trivy, Grype, and S3-compatible storage
Cons
  • Project Quay and hosted Quay.io require a deployment choice
  • Advanced controls may exceed basic image-storage needs
  • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the registry environment
  • Vulnerability scanning depends on an external Trivy or Grype service
  • Not positioned as a hosted registry with managed operations
Our verdict

Quay is a container registry for developers and organizations that build, store, organize, scan, and distribute container images and other OCI artifacts. It supports web and API access, as well as self-hosted deployment. Project Quay is…

Read the review →

Angos is an open-source, self-hosted container registry for development, CI/CD, and infrastructure teams distributing Docker-compatible and OCI images. It supports the OCI Distribution Specification v1.1 and can store images on a…

Read the review →
  1. QuayContainer Registries 9.3Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. AngosContainer Registries 9.0Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Quay — where it wins

    • Automated vulnerability scanning with Clair
    • OCI 1.1 referrers, immutable tags, and retention policies
    • Mirroring and geo-replication for distributed repositories

    Where it doesn't

    • Project Quay and hosted Quay.io require a deployment choice
    • Advanced controls may exceed basic image-storage needs
    • Self-hosted deployment adds operational responsibility
  • Angos — where it wins

    • CEL policies cover access control, retention, and pruning
    • Supports immutable tags, replication, and pull-through caching
    • Works with OIDC, mTLS, Trivy, Grype, and S3-compatible storage

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the registry environment
    • Vulnerability scanning depends on an external Trivy or Grype service
    • Not positioned as a hosted registry with managed operations
  • Quay9.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A flexible registry for teams that need hosted convenience or self-hosted control.

    Visit QuayFull verdict →
  • Angos9.0/10 · Open source

    An open-source registry for teams that need policy controls, caching, replication, and self-hosting.

    Visit AngosFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update