Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · eBPF Observability Tools

Qpoint vs Gyeeta

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Qpoint #7 in eBPF Observability Tools 6.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Qpoint
Gyeeta #8 in eBPF Observability Tools 6.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Gyeeta

Qpoint leads on 3 checks, Gyeeta on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreQpoint · 6.9/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresQpoint · 3 of 4

Qpoint scores higher on our rubric for ebpf observability tools: 6.9 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

On deployment model, Qpoint gives you Hybrid where Gyeeta offers Self-hosted. Qpoint offers kubernetes support; Gyeeta doesn't publish it. Qpoint offers network visibility; Gyeeta doesn't publish it. Qpoint offers application tracing; Gyeeta doesn't publish it.

Qpoint is the better fit for network visibility with OpenTelemetry output. Gyeeta is the better fit for open-source host and service monitoring.

  • Qpoint fits best

    Network visibility with OpenTelemetry output

  • Gyeeta fits best

    Open-source host and service monitoring

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Qpoint 6.9/10 Visit ↗ Gyeeta 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.9 6.8
Ranking #7 in eBPF Observability Tools #8 in eBPF Observability Tools
Best for Network visibility with OpenTelemetry output Open-source host and service monitoring
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web, Linux Web, Linux
Support Email, Live chat, Phone, Community · 24/7 Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Qpoint 3/4 · Gyeeta 0/4
Kubernetes support ✓ (best) Not published
Network visibility ✓ (best) Not published
Application tracing ✓ (best) Not published
Kernel profiling Not published Not published
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Self-hosted
Supported operating systems Linux-based operating systems; kernel 5.10+; x86_64 and arm64 Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Captures traffic with process and container attribution
  • Exports OpenTelemetry logs and traces plus Prometheus metrics
  • Supports Docker, Kubernetes, Helm, and S3-compatible storage
  • Monitors hosts, services, processes, resources, network flows, and clusters
  • Uses eBPF and kernel statistics without application instrumentation
  • Includes web UI, REST APIs, alerts, and multiple notification channels
Cons
  • Primarily focused on network telemetry rather than full observability
  • Linux-based deployment requires kernel 5.10 or later
  • Team and Enterprise pricing require contacting sales
  • Host monitoring requires an agent rather than an agentless deployment
  • Host monitoring is limited to Linux environments
  • Self-hosting requires deployment and operation of the monitoring stack
Our verdict

Qpoint provides Qtap, a Linux-based eBPF agent for capturing application network traffic and adding connection, HTTP/S, process, container, and protocol context. It is designed for infrastructure, platform, security, and observability…

Read the review →

Gyeeta is a free, GPLv3-licensed observability tool for Linux infrastructure. It is aimed at teams that need host, service, process, network-flow, and cluster monitoring without adding instrumentation to application code. The product…

Read the review →
  1. QpointeBPF Observability Tools 6.9Free plan
  2. GyeetaeBPF Observability Tools 6.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Qpoint — where it wins

    • Captures traffic with process and container attribution
    • Exports OpenTelemetry logs and traces plus Prometheus metrics
    • Supports Docker, Kubernetes, Helm, and S3-compatible storage

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily focused on network telemetry rather than full observability
    • Linux-based deployment requires kernel 5.10 or later
    • Team and Enterprise pricing require contacting sales

  • Gyeeta — where it wins

    • Monitors hosts, services, processes, resources, network flows, and clusters
    • Uses eBPF and kernel statistics without application instrumentation
    • Includes web UI, REST APIs, alerts, and multiple notification channels

    Where it doesn't

    • Host monitoring requires an agent rather than an agentless deployment
    • Host monitoring is limited to Linux environments
    • Self-hosting requires deployment and operation of the monitoring stack
  • Qpoint6.9/10 · Free plan

    A focused network telemetry tool with OpenTelemetry output and Kubernetes support.

    Visit QpointFull verdict →
  • Gyeeta6.8/10 · Free plan

    A broad, free observability stack for Linux hosts, services, processes, and network flows.

    Visit GyeetaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All eBPF observability tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update