Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · eBPF Observability Tools

DeepFlow vs Gyeeta

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score DeepFlow #2 in eBPF Observability Tools 9.1/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit DeepFlow
Gyeeta #7 in eBPF Observability Tools 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Gyeeta

DeepFlow leads on 0 checks, Gyeeta on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDeepFlow · 9.1/10
  • Free planonly Gyeeta
  • Most featuresDeepFlow · 4 of 4

DeepFlow scores higher on our rubric for ebpf observability tools: 9.1 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

On deployment model, DeepFlow gives you Hybrid where Gyeeta offers Self-hosted.

DeepFlow is the better fit for open-source full-stack observability. Gyeeta is the better fit for open-source host and service monitoring.

  • DeepFlow fits best

    Open-source full-stack observability

  • Gyeeta fits best

    Open-source host and service monitoring

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature DeepFlow 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Gyeeta 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.6
Ranking #2 in eBPF Observability Tools #7 in eBPF Observability Tools
Best for Open-source full-stack observability Open-source host and service monitoring
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Open source Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux, Android Web, Linux
Support Email, Phone, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features DeepFlow 4/4 · Gyeeta 0/4
Kubernetes support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Network visibility ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Application tracing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Kernel profiling ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Self-hosted
Supported operating systems Linux, Windows, Android Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Zero-instrumentation tracing with universal service maps
  • Continuous on-CPU and off-CPU profiling
  • Integrations with Prometheus, OpenTelemetry, and Grafana
  • Monitors hosts, services, processes, resources, network flows, and clusters
  • Uses eBPF and kernel statistics without application instrumentation
  • Includes web UI, REST APIs, alerts, and multiple notification channels
Cons
  • Covers a wide scope rather than a narrowly focused workflow
  • Cloud Edition is described as testing or beta
  • Requires Kubernetes or infrastructure observability needs to justify its breadth
  • Host monitoring requires an agent rather than an agentless deployment
  • Host monitoring is limited to Linux environments
  • Self-hosting requires deployment and operation of the monitoring stack
Our verdict

DeepFlow is an open-source observability platform from Yunshan Networks for cloud infrastructure and cloud-native applications. It uses eBPF and related technologies to collect application metrics, request logs, distributed traces, network…

Read the review →

Gyeeta is a free, GPLv3-licensed observability tool for Linux infrastructure. It is aimed at teams that need host, service, process, network-flow, and cluster monitoring without adding instrumentation to application code. The product…

Read the review →
  1. DeepFloweBPF Observability Tools 9.1Open source
  2. GyeetaeBPF Observability Tools 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • DeepFlow — where it wins

    • Zero-instrumentation tracing with universal service maps
    • Continuous on-CPU and off-CPU profiling
    • Integrations with Prometheus, OpenTelemetry, and Grafana

    Where it doesn't

    • Covers a wide scope rather than a narrowly focused workflow
    • Cloud Edition is described as testing or beta
    • Requires Kubernetes or infrastructure observability needs to justify its breadth

  • Gyeeta — where it wins

    • Monitors hosts, services, processes, resources, network flows, and clusters
    • Uses eBPF and kernel statistics without application instrumentation
    • Includes web UI, REST APIs, alerts, and multiple notification channels

    Where it doesn't

    • Host monitoring requires an agent rather than an agentless deployment
    • Host monitoring is limited to Linux environments
    • Self-hosting requires deployment and operation of the monitoring stack

More comparisons

All eBPF observability tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update