Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Terminal Emulators

PuTTY vs Alacritty

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score PuTTY #5 in Terminal Emulators 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit PuTTY
Alacritty #8 in Terminal Emulators 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 5 features Visit Alacritty

PuTTY leads on 0 checks, Alacritty on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePuTTY · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresAlacritty · 2 of 5

PuTTY scores higher on our rubric for terminal emulators: 8.8 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

PuTTY is the better fit for free SSH and network-session management. Alacritty is the better fit for minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering.

  • PuTTY fits best

    Free SSH and network-session management

  • Alacritty fits best

    Minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature PuTTY 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Alacritty 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.5
Ranking #5 in Terminal Emulators #8 in Terminal Emulators
Best for Free SSH and network-session management Minimalist cross-platform users prioritizing fast rendering
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Linux, macOS, Windows
Features PuTTY 0/5 · Alacritty 2/5
Split panes Not checked yet —
Session sync Not checked yet Not checked yet
GPU acceleration Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Scripting API Not checked yet ✓ (best)
SSH support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms Windows and Unix Linux, macOS, Windows, BSD
Our review
Pros
  • Supports SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, serial, raw, and other connections
  • Includes SFTP, SCP, port forwarding, proxy support, and X11 forwarding
  • Provides saved sessions, Pageant, PSCP, PSFTP, and Plink
  • GPU-accelerated OpenGL rendering across Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Search, Vi mode, regex hints, and mouse-based URL opening
  • Live reload, multiple windows, and IPC control via alacritty msg
Cons
  • Session management is basic
  • No release-quality Android, iOS, or macOS ports
  • Unix support is provided as source code
  • No built-in split panes; pane layouts rely on external tools
  • No built-in session synchronization
  • Focused on terminal emulation rather than replacing shell tools
Our verdict

PuTTY is a free, open-source terminal client for users who need SSH access, file transfer, serial connections, or other network sessions. It supports Windows and Unix systems and combines an xterm-style terminal emulator with tools for…

Read the review →

Alacritty is an open-source terminal emulator for people who work with command-line shells on Linux, macOS, Windows, and BSD. Its focus is a fast, configurable terminal experience that works with existing shells and terminal tools instead…

Read the review →
  1. PuTTYTerminal Emulators 8.8Free plan
  2. AlacrittyTerminal Emulators 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • PuTTY — where it wins

    • Supports SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, serial, raw, and other connections
    • Includes SFTP, SCP, port forwarding, proxy support, and X11 forwarding
    • Provides saved sessions, Pageant, PSCP, PSFTP, and Plink

    Where it doesn't

    • Session management is basic
    • No release-quality Android, iOS, or macOS ports
    • Unix support is provided as source code
  • Alacritty — where it wins

    • GPU-accelerated OpenGL rendering across Linux, macOS, and Windows
    • Search, Vi mode, regex hints, and mouse-based URL opening
    • Live reload, multiple windows, and IPC control via alacritty msg

    Where it doesn't

    • No built-in split panes; pane layouts rely on external tools
    • No built-in session synchronization
    • Focused on terminal emulation rather than replacing shell tools

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update