Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Archiving Software

OpenText InfoArchive vs ZL Unified Archive

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText InfoArchive #4 in Archiving Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Contact OpenText
ZL Unified Archive #5 in Archiving Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit site

OpenText InfoArchive leads on 0 checks, ZL Unified Archive on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText InfoArchive · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresOpenText InfoArchive · 3 of 4

OpenText InfoArchive scores higher on our rubric for archiving software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

OpenText InfoArchive is the better fit for enterprise records and application archiving. ZL Unified Archive is the better fit for large organizations archiving content across systems.

  • OpenText InfoArchive fits best

    Enterprise records and application archiving

  • ZL Unified Archive fits best

    Large organizations archiving content across systems

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText InfoArchive 9.0/10 Visit ↗ ZL Unified Archive 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #4 in Archiving Software #5 in Archiving Software
Best for Enterprise records and application archiving Large organizations archiving content across systems
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs, Community Email, Phone
Compliance HIPAA SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA
Integrations 6 integrations 17 integrations
Built for Enterprise Enterprise
Features OpenText InfoArchive 3/4 · ZL Unified Archive 1/4
Legal hold ✓ ✓
E-discovery tools ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Immutable storage ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Email archiving Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Hybrid Not checked yet
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Archives structured and unstructured data in one place
  • Combines event-based retention, legal holds, and audit trails
  • Supports cloud, on-premises, and hybrid deployments
  • Centralizes retention policies, legal holds, and archived content.
  • Searches across email, files, collaboration, social, and legacy data.
  • Deduplication and single-copy storage reduce duplicate archived content.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting OpenText
  • Enterprise-focused fit may not suit smaller organizations
  • Support channels listed are documentation and community
  • Pricing requires contacting sales for a consultation.
  • Enterprise focus may be more than smaller organizations need.
  • Broad source coverage may be unnecessary for teams archiving one content type.
Our verdict

OpenText InfoArchive preserves structured and unstructured information for organizations that need long-term access to historical records. It is aimed at enterprise teams consolidating records, retiring legacy applications, or archiving…

Read the review →

ZL Unified Archive is an enterprise information governance and archiving platform for large organizations managing unstructured content across systems. It brings email, files, Microsoft 365, Teams, social media, instant messages, and…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText InfoArchiveArchiving Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. ZL Unified ArchiveArchiving Software 8.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText InfoArchive — where it wins

    • Archives structured and unstructured data in one place
    • Combines event-based retention, legal holds, and audit trails
    • Supports cloud, on-premises, and hybrid deployments

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting OpenText
    • Enterprise-focused fit may not suit smaller organizations
    • Support channels listed are documentation and community

  • ZL Unified Archive — where it wins

    • Centralizes retention policies, legal holds, and archived content.
    • Searches across email, files, collaboration, social, and legacy data.
    • Deduplication and single-copy storage reduce duplicate archived content.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales for a consultation.
    • Enterprise focus may be more than smaller organizations need.
    • Broad source coverage may be unnecessary for teams archiving one content type.
  • OpenText InfoArchive9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    Enterprise archiving for application retirement, retention controls, and access to historical data.

    Contact OpenTextFull verdict →
  • ZL Unified Archive8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A centralized archive for enterprise retention, legal holds, search, and eDiscovery.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

All archiving software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update