Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Archiving Software

ZL Unified Archive vs Arkivum

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score ZL Unified Archive #5 in Archiving Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit site
Arkivum #8 in Archiving Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit Arkivum

ZL Unified Archive leads on 0 checks, Arkivum on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreZL Unified Archive · 8.8/10

ZL Unified Archive scores higher on our rubric for archiving software: 8.8 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

ZL Unified Archive is the better fit for large organizations archiving content across systems. Arkivum is the better fit for regulated digital-record preservation.

  • ZL Unified Archive fits best

    Large organizations archiving content across systems

  • Arkivum fits best

    Regulated digital-record preservation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ZL Unified Archive 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Arkivum 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.5
Ranking #5 in Archiving Software #8 in Archiving Software
Best for Large organizations archiving content across systems Regulated digital-record preservation
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Phone Email, Phone, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA ISO 27001, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 17 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ZL Unified Archive 1/4 · Arkivum 1/4
Legal hold ✓ ✓
E-discovery tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Immutable storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Email archiving Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Centralizes retention policies, legal holds, and archived content.
  • Searches across email, files, collaboration, social, and legacy data.
  • Deduplication and single-copy storage reduce duplicate archived content.
  • Retention rules, expiration notices, and legal holds for archived records
  • Immutable files, fixity checks, and chain-of-custody reporting
  • SharePoint and OneDrive ingestion with metadata and full-text search
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales for a consultation.
  • Enterprise focus may be more than smaller organizations need.
  • Broad source coverage may be unnecessary for teams archiving one content type.
  • Pricing is handled through contact with the vendor
  • The product is focused on archiving and preservation rather than general file work
  • Cloud deployment may not fit teams seeking another deployment model
Our verdict

ZL Unified Archive is an enterprise information governance and archiving platform for large organizations managing unstructured content across systems. It brings email, files, Microsoft 365, Teams, social media, instant messages, and…

Read the review →

Arkivum is a SaaS digital archiving and preservation service for organisations that need long-term access to records and data. Its stated audiences include regulated industries, scientific research, corporate archives, and cultural…

Read the review →
  1. ZL Unified ArchiveArchiving Software 8.8Pricing on request
  2. ArkivumArchiving Software 8.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ZL Unified Archive — where it wins

    • Centralizes retention policies, legal holds, and archived content.
    • Searches across email, files, collaboration, social, and legacy data.
    • Deduplication and single-copy storage reduce duplicate archived content.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales for a consultation.
    • Enterprise focus may be more than smaller organizations need.
    • Broad source coverage may be unnecessary for teams archiving one content type.
  • Arkivum — where it wins

    • Retention rules, expiration notices, and legal holds for archived records
    • Immutable files, fixity checks, and chain-of-custody reporting
    • SharePoint and OneDrive ingestion with metadata and full-text search

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact with the vendor
    • The product is focused on archiving and preservation rather than general file work
    • Cloud deployment may not fit teams seeking another deployment model
  • ZL Unified Archive8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A centralized archive for enterprise retention, legal holds, search, and eDiscovery.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Arkivum8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A cloud archive focused on preserving and governing valuable digital records.

    Visit ArkivumFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update