Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Remote Patient Monitoring

HealthArc vs Tenovi

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score HealthArc #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit HealthArc
Tenovi #8 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Contact Tenovi

HealthArc leads on 0 checks, Tenovi on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreHealthArc · 8.9/10
  • Most featuresHealthArc · 2 of 3

HealthArc scores higher on our rubric for remote patient monitoring: 8.9 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

On monitoring scope, Tenovi gives you Both where HealthArc offers Chronic care.

HealthArc is the better fit for practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing. Tenovi is the better fit for teams needing RPM device connectivity infrastructure.

  • HealthArc fits best

    Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing

  • Tenovi fits best

    Teams needing RPM device connectivity infrastructure

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature HealthArc 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Tenovi 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.3
Ranking #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring #8 in Remote Patient Monitoring
Best for Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing Teams needing RPM device connectivity infrastructure
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Phone, Live chat, Email · 24/7 Email, Phone, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, HIPAA SOC 2, HIPAA
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features HealthArc 2/3 · Tenovi 1/3
Out-of-range alerts ✓ ✓
Patient app — —
EHR integrations ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Device connectivity Cellular Not checked yet
Monitoring scope Chronic care Both
Supported conditions hypertension, diabetes, COPD, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity asthma, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, respiratory infections, sepsis
Our review
Pros
  • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
  • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
  • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.
  • Connects Bluetooth gateway-connected and direct cellular devices
  • Aggregates readings and supports configurable threshold alerts
  • Offers device fulfillment, connectivity support, and API access
Cons
  • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
  • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.
  • Requires a separate RPM dashboard or care platform for workflows
  • No patient-facing mobile app is documented
  • Access is arranged through a demo or sales inquiry
Our verdict

HealthArc brings remote patient monitoring and care-management workflows into a platform for physician practices, health systems and virtual-care companies. It collects readings from cellular-connected medical devices and presents them…

Read the review →

Tenovi provides connected devices, cellular gateways, data aggregation, fulfillment, and APIs for remote patient monitoring and remote therapeutic monitoring programs. Healthcare organizations and RPM software companies can use its…

Read the review →
  1. HealthArcRemote Patient Monitoring 8.9Pricing on request
  2. TenoviRemote Patient Monitoring 8.3Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • HealthArc — where it wins

    • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
    • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
    • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.

    Where it doesn't

    • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
    • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.

  • Tenovi — where it wins

    • Connects Bluetooth gateway-connected and direct cellular devices
    • Aggregates readings and supports configurable threshold alerts
    • Offers device fulfillment, connectivity support, and API access

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a separate RPM dashboard or care platform for workflows
    • No patient-facing mobile app is documented
    • Access is arranged through a demo or sales inquiry

More comparisons

All remote patient monitoring comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update