Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Remote Patient Monitoring

CareSimple vs HealthArc

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score CareSimple #1 in Remote Patient Monitoring 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit CareSimple
HealthArc #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit HealthArc

CareSimple leads on 1 check, HealthArc on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCareSimple · 9.2/10
  • Most featuresCareSimple · 3 of 3

CareSimple scores higher on our rubric for remote patient monitoring: 9.2 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

On monitoring scope, CareSimple gives you Both where HealthArc offers Chronic care. CareSimple offers patient app; HealthArc doesn't.

CareSimple is the better fit for organizations needing end-to-end RPM operations. HealthArc is the better fit for practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing.

  • CareSimple fits best

    Organizations needing end-to-end RPM operations

  • HealthArc fits best

    Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CareSimple 9.2/10 Visit ↗ HealthArc 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.9
Ranking #1 in Remote Patient Monitoring #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring
Best for Organizations needing end-to-end RPM operations Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Phone, Email, Live chat, Docs Phone, Live chat, Email · 24/7
Compliance ISO 27001, HIPAA SOC 2, HIPAA
Integrations 7 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features CareSimple 3/3 · HealthArc 2/3
Out-of-range alerts ✓ ✓
Patient app ✓ (best) —
EHR integrations ✓ ✓
Specs
Device connectivity Not checked yet Cellular
Monitoring scope Both Chronic care
Supported conditions Hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, maternity, COPD, CKD, dyslipidemia, obesity, coronavirus, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, pregnancy hypertension, diabetes, COPD, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity
Our review
Pros
  • Combines cellular device readings with manual patient entries
  • Links condition-specific alerts and care plans with EHR workflows
  • Automates monitoring-time tracking and CPT charge capture
  • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
  • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
  • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.
Cons
  • Pricing requires a demo or sales contact
  • Broad operational scope may exceed teams seeking only basic monitoring
  • Managed nurse-led support is optional rather than part of every deployment
  • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
  • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.
Our verdict

CareSimple brings remote patient monitoring software and connected cellular medical devices together for health systems, physician groups, payers, and research programs. Clinicians can review readings, manage monitoring tasks, and…

Read the review →

HealthArc brings remote patient monitoring and care-management workflows into a platform for physician practices, health systems and virtual-care companies. It collects readings from cellular-connected medical devices and presents them…

Read the review →
  1. CareSimpleRemote Patient Monitoring 9.2Pricing on request
  2. HealthArcRemote Patient Monitoring 8.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CareSimple — where it wins

    • Combines cellular device readings with manual patient entries
    • Links condition-specific alerts and care plans with EHR workflows
    • Automates monitoring-time tracking and CPT charge capture

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a demo or sales contact
    • Broad operational scope may exceed teams seeking only basic monitoring
    • Managed nurse-led support is optional rather than part of every deployment

  • HealthArc — where it wins

    • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
    • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
    • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.

    Where it doesn't

    • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
    • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.

More comparisons

All remote patient monitoring comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update