Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Remote Patient Monitoring

HealthArc vs Biofourmis

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score HealthArc #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit HealthArc
Biofourmis #4 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Biofourmis

HealthArc leads on 0 checks, Biofourmis on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreHealthArc · 8.9/10
  • Most featuresBiofourmis · 3 of 3

HealthArc scores higher on our rubric for remote patient monitoring: 8.9 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

On monitoring scope, Biofourmis gives you Both where HealthArc offers Chronic care. Biofourmis offers patient app; HealthArc doesn't.

HealthArc is the better fit for practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing. Biofourmis is the better fit for health systems needing analytics-led remote care.

  • HealthArc fits best

    Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing

  • Biofourmis fits best

    Health systems needing analytics-led remote care

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature HealthArc 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Biofourmis 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.8
Ranking #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring #4 in Remote Patient Monitoring
Best for Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing Health systems needing analytics-led remote care
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Phone, Live chat, Email · 24/7 Docs · 24/7
Integrations 10 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features HealthArc 2/3 · Biofourmis 3/3
Out-of-range alerts ✓ ✓
Patient app — ✓ (best)
EHR integrations ✓ ✓
Specs
Device connectivity Cellular Not checked yet
Monitoring scope Chronic care Both
Supported conditions hypertension, diabetes, COPD, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, lipid disorders, atrial fibrillation, COPD
Our review
Pros
  • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
  • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
  • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.
  • Combines continuous and episodic monitoring with patient-specific analytics
  • Supports cellular and Bluetooth devices across multiple conditions
  • Links clinician workflows, patient apps, EMRs, and in-home services
Cons
  • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
  • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than self-serve checkout
  • No free plan is offered
  • Programs require coordinating pathways, devices, EMR integration, and services
Our verdict

HealthArc brings remote patient monitoring and care-management workflows into a platform for physician practices, health systems and virtual-care companies. It collects readings from cellular-connected medical devices and presents them…

Read the review →

Biofourmis provides a configurable remote-care platform for hospitals, health systems, and payers. It connects medical-grade monitoring devices and sensors, including cellular-connected and Bluetooth devices, then collects continuous and…

Read the review →
  1. HealthArcRemote Patient Monitoring 8.9Pricing on request
  2. BiofourmisRemote Patient Monitoring 8.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • HealthArc — where it wins

    • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
    • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
    • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.

    Where it doesn't

    • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
    • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.

  • Biofourmis — where it wins

    • Combines continuous and episodic monitoring with patient-specific analytics
    • Supports cellular and Bluetooth devices across multiple conditions
    • Links clinician workflows, patient apps, EMRs, and in-home services

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than self-serve checkout
    • No free plan is offered
    • Programs require coordinating pathways, devices, EMR integration, and services
  • HealthArc8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Cellular RPM monitoring combines alerts, billing workflows and EHR exchange.

    Visit HealthArcFull verdict →
  • Biofourmis8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Analytics-led RPM combining device data, clinician triage, patient apps, and care-at-home coordination.

    Visit BiofourmisFull verdict →

More comparisons

All remote patient monitoring comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update