Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Remote Patient Monitoring

HealthArc vs Doccla

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score HealthArc #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit HealthArc
Doccla #7 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Doccla

HealthArc leads on 0 checks, Doccla on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreHealthArc · 8.9/10
  • Most featuresDoccla · 3 of 3

HealthArc scores higher on our rubric for remote patient monitoring: 8.9 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

On device connectivity, HealthArc gives you Cellular where Doccla offers Bluetooth. On monitoring scope, Doccla gives you Both where HealthArc offers Chronic care. Doccla offers patient app; HealthArc doesn't.

HealthArc is the better fit for practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing. Doccla is the better fit for UK care teams needing connected monitoring workflows.

  • HealthArc fits best

    Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing

  • Doccla fits best

    UK care teams needing connected monitoring workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature HealthArc 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Doccla 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.5
Ranking #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring #7 in Remote Patient Monitoring
Best for Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing UK care teams needing connected monitoring workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Phone, Live chat, Email · 24/7 Email, Phone · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2, HIPAA ISO 27001, GDPR
Integrations 10 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features HealthArc 2/3 · Doccla 3/3
Out-of-range alerts ✓ ✓
Patient app — ✓ (best)
EHR integrations ✓ ✓
Specs
Device connectivity Cellular Bluetooth
Monitoring scope Chronic care Both
Supported conditions hypertension, diabetes, COPD, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity COPD; asthma; acute respiratory infections; frailty; heart failure
Our review
Pros
  • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
  • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
  • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.
  • Bluetooth-connected devices feed patient vital signs into clinician dashboards.
  • Two-way EHR integration includes SystmOne, Cerner and EMIS.
  • Managed onboarding, device logistics and patient follow-ups support care programs.
Cons
  • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
  • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.
  • Pricing requires contacting Doccla to scope the program and implementation.
  • The supported condition pathways focus on five listed conditions.
  • Designed for mid-market and enterprise organisations rather than smaller teams.
Our verdict

HealthArc brings remote patient monitoring and care-management workflows into a platform for physician practices, health systems and virtual-care companies. It collects readings from cellular-connected medical devices and presents them…

Read the review →

Doccla provides remote patient monitoring and managed virtual wards for health systems, hospitals and care organisations. It is aimed at teams supporting early discharge and chronic-condition management across the UK, Ireland and wider…

Read the review →
  1. HealthArcRemote Patient Monitoring 8.9Pricing on request
  2. DocclaRemote Patient Monitoring 8.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • HealthArc — where it wins

    • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
    • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
    • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.

    Where it doesn't

    • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
    • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.

  • Doccla — where it wins

    • Bluetooth-connected devices feed patient vital signs into clinician dashboards.
    • Two-way EHR integration includes SystmOne, Cerner and EMIS.
    • Managed onboarding, device logistics and patient follow-ups support care programs.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Doccla to scope the program and implementation.
    • The supported condition pathways focus on five listed conditions.
    • Designed for mid-market and enterprise organisations rather than smaller teams.
  • HealthArc8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Cellular RPM monitoring combines alerts, billing workflows and EHR exchange.

    Visit HealthArcFull verdict →
  • Doccla8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    Connected devices, care-team alerts and EHR links support remote monitoring workflows.

    Visit DocclaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All remote patient monitoring comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update