Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Remote Patient Monitoring

HealthArc vs 100Plus

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score HealthArc #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit HealthArc
100Plus #5 in Remote Patient Monitoring 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit 100Plus

HealthArc leads on 0 checks, 100Plus on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreHealthArc · 8.9/10

HealthArc scores higher on our rubric for remote patient monitoring: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

HealthArc is the better fit for practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing. 100Plus is the better fit for practices needing cellular RPM with clinical support.

  • HealthArc fits best

    Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing

  • 100Plus fits best

    Practices needing cellular RPM with clinical support

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature HealthArc 8.9/10 Visit ↗ 100Plus 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.7
Ranking #3 in Remote Patient Monitoring #5 in Remote Patient Monitoring
Best for Practices prioritizing cellular RPM and billing Practices needing cellular RPM with clinical support
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Phone, Live chat, Email · 24/7 Phone, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, HIPAA HIPAA, 2FA
Integrations 10 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features HealthArc 2/3 · 100Plus 2/3
Out-of-range alerts ✓ ✓
Patient app — —
EHR integrations ✓ ✓
Specs
Device connectivity Cellular Cellular
Monitoring scope Chronic care Chronic care
Supported conditions hypertension, diabetes, COPD, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity diabetes, hypertension, heart disease
Our review
Pros
  • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
  • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
  • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.
  • Monitors glucose, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and weight
  • Clinical review, configured alerts, and patient outreach support care between visits
  • Integrates with five listed EHRs and tracks RPM claims and monitoring time
Cons
  • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
  • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.
  • Pricing requires contacting 100Plus
  • The listed platform is web-based, with cloud deployment
  • RPM devices do not require an app, but no dedicated patient mobile app is verified
Our verdict

HealthArc brings remote patient monitoring and care-management workflows into a platform for physician practices, health systems and virtual-care companies. It collects readings from cellular-connected medical devices and presents them…

Read the review →

100Plus combines remote patient monitoring and chronic care management for practices caring for patients between office visits. Cellular-connected devices capture blood glucose, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and weight, while a provider…

Read the review →
  1. HealthArcRemote Patient Monitoring 8.9Pricing on request
  2. 100PlusRemote Patient Monitoring 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • HealthArc — where it wins

    • Cellular devices transmit readings without app installation or Bluetooth pairing.
    • Tracks transmission days and documents care-management billing workflows.
    • Exchanges data with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth.

    Where it doesn't

    • No patient app is listed for monitoring workflows.
    • Software subscription pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Clinical monitoring and care coordination are optional services.

  • 100Plus — where it wins

    • Monitors glucose, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and weight
    • Clinical review, configured alerts, and patient outreach support care between visits
    • Integrates with five listed EHRs and tracks RPM claims and monitoring time

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting 100Plus
    • The listed platform is web-based, with cloud deployment
    • RPM devices do not require an app, but no dedicated patient mobile app is verified

More comparisons

All remote patient monitoring comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update