Head-to-head · Git Clients
gitg vs Kommit
gitg leads on 0 checks, Kommit on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Free planonly gitg
gitg and Kommit score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for git clients; gitg sits at #6 and Kommit at #7 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.
gitg is the better fit for linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks. Kommit is the better fit for linux users seeking a basic graphical Git client.
- gitg fits best
Linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks
- Kommit fits best
Linux users seeking a basic graphical Git client
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | gitg 7.9/10 Visit ↗ | Kommit 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #6 in Git Clients | #7 in Git Clients |
| Best for | Linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks | Linux users seeking a basic graphical Git client |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Linux |
| Support | Community | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business | Solo, Small business |
| Features gitg 0/3 · Kommit 0/3 | ||
| Visual history | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Conflict resolution | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Submodule support | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Repository hosting | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Git workflows | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | For developers who prefer a desktop interface for everyday repository work, gitg offers a free, open-source graphical Git client developed for the GNOME ecosystem. It runs on Linux and Windows and covers common tasks: browsing repository… Read the review → |
Kommit is KDE’s graphical Git client for Linux desktops, aimed at developers who want a desktop interface for working with repositories rather than a hosted version-control service. Its workflow covers browsing files from another branch or… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
gitg — where it wins
- Visualizes repository history, files, commits, and diffs
- Supports cloning repositories and adding existing ones
- Stages changes, creates commits, and retrieves patches
Where it doesn't
- Focused on common Git tasks rather than advanced workflows
- Desktop deployment does not cover other platforms
- Support is community-based
Kommit — where it wins
- Browse files from another branch or commit and view commit and merge graphs
- Review visual changes, compare diffs, and resolve conflicts
- Open-source GPL-3.0 software with Dolphin overlay icons
Where it doesn't
- Available for Linux desktops only
- Listed workflows focus on core repository browsing and change review
- Support is through community resources and documentation
- gitg7.9/10 · Free plan
A free visual Git client for common repository tasks on Linux and Windows.
Visit gitgFull verdict → - Kommit7.9/10 · Open source
A focused Linux desktop interface for browsing, reviewing, and resolving Git changes.
Visit KDEFull verdict →
More comparisons
- GitKraken Desktop vs gitg
- GitKraken Desktop vs Kommit
- Git vs gitg
- Git vs Kommit
- TortoiseGit vs gitg
- TortoiseGit vs Kommit
- Sourcetree vs gitg
- Sourcetree vs Kommit
All git clients comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



