Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Git Clients

Git vs Kommit

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Git #2 in Git Clients 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Git
Kommit #7 in Git Clients 7.9/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 3 features Visit KDE

Git leads on 0 checks, Kommit on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGit · 8.6/10
  • Free planonly Git

Git scores higher on our rubric for git clients: 8.6 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

Git is the better fit for teams and developers comfortable with command-line Git. Kommit is the better fit for linux users seeking a basic graphical Git client.

  • Git fits best

    Teams and developers comfortable with command-line Git

  • Kommit fits best

    Linux users seeking a basic graphical Git client

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Git 8.6/10 Visit ↗ Kommit 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.6 7.9
Ranking #2 in Git Clients #7 in Git Clients
Best for Teams and developers comfortable with command-line Git Linux users seeking a basic graphical Git client
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop, Self-hosted Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business
Features Git 0/3 · Kommit 0/3
Visual history Not checked yet Not checked yet
Conflict resolution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Submodule support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Repository hosting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Git workflows Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source version control for Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Local repositories preserve full project history for branching and merging
  • Sparse checkouts and submodules support selective and nested repository work
  • Browse files from another branch or commit and view commit and merge graphs
  • Review visual changes, compare diffs, and resolve conflicts
  • Open-source GPL-3.0 software with Dolphin overlay icons
Cons
  • Primarily a command-line tool, not a dedicated graphical client
  • Large-file handling depends on an extension
  • Support is through community and documentation
  • Available for Linux desktops only
  • Listed workflows focus on core repository browsing and change review
  • Support is through community resources and documentation
Our verdict

Git tracks changes in software projects through distributed repositories, with local project history and remote synchronization. It is suited to developers and teams across a broad range of project sizes who want version control on…

Read the review →

Kommit is KDE’s graphical Git client for Linux desktops, aimed at developers who want a desktop interface for working with repositories rather than a hosted version-control service. Its workflow covers browsing files from another branch or…

Read the review →
  1. GitGit Clients 8.6Free plan
  2. KommitGit Clients 7.9Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Git — where it wins

    • Free, open-source version control for Windows, macOS, and Linux
    • Local repositories preserve full project history for branching and merging
    • Sparse checkouts and submodules support selective and nested repository work

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily a command-line tool, not a dedicated graphical client
    • Large-file handling depends on an extension
    • Support is through community and documentation

  • Kommit — where it wins

    • Browse files from another branch or commit and view commit and merge graphs
    • Review visual changes, compare diffs, and resolve conflicts
    • Open-source GPL-3.0 software with Dolphin overlay icons

    Where it doesn't

    • Available for Linux desktops only
    • Listed workflows focus on core repository browsing and change review
    • Support is through community resources and documentation
  • Git8.6/10 · Free plan

    A mature Git foundation across desktop platforms, though primarily command-line rather than graphical.

    Visit GitFull verdict →
  • Kommit7.9/10 · Open source

    A focused Linux desktop interface for browsing, reviewing, and resolving Git changes.

    Visit KDEFull verdict →

More comparisons

All git clients comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update