Head-to-head · Git Clients
Sourcetree vs gitg
Sourcetree leads on 0 checks, gitg on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSourcetree · 8.2/10
- Free planboth
Sourcetree scores higher on our rubric for git clients: 8.2 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.
Sourcetree is the better fit for free Git GUI users on Windows or macOS. gitg is the better fit for linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks.
- Sourcetree fits best
Free Git GUI users on Windows or macOS
- gitg fits best
Linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Sourcetree 8.2/10 Visit ↗ | gitg 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #4 in Git Clients | #6 in Git Clients |
| Best for | Free Git GUI users on Windows or macOS | Linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS | Linux, Windows |
| Support | Docs, Community | Community |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business |
| Features Sourcetree 0/3 · gitg 0/3 | ||
| Visual history | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Conflict resolution | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Submodule support | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Repository hosting | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Git workflows | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Sourcetree is a free desktop graphical client for Git and Mercurial repositories, available on Windows and macOS. It is aimed at beginners, experienced developers, and managed enterprise environments that want a visual alternative to… Read the review → |
For developers who prefer a desktop interface for everyday repository work, gitg offers a free, open-source graphical Git client developed for the GNOME ecosystem. It runs on Linux and Windows and covers common tasks: browsing repository… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Sourcetree — where it wins
- Visual history and branching diagrams clarify repository changes.
- Stage or discard changes by file, hunk, or line.
- Includes Git LFS, submodules, Git-flow, and interactive rebase.
Where it doesn't
- Desktop deployment does not provide a browser-based workflow.
- Windows and macOS are the supported desktop platforms.
- Support is centered on documentation and community channels.
gitg — where it wins
- Visualizes repository history, files, commits, and diffs
- Supports cloning repositories and adding existing ones
- Stages changes, creates commits, and retrieves patches
Where it doesn't
- Focused on common Git tasks rather than advanced workflows
- Desktop deployment does not cover other platforms
- Support is community-based
- Sourcetree8.2/10 · Free plan
A free visual Git client with granular staging, history tools, LFS, and Git-flow.
Visit SourcetreeFull verdict → - gitg7.9/10 · Free plan
A free visual Git client for common repository tasks on Linux and Windows.
Visit gitgFull verdict →
More comparisons
- GitKraken Desktop vs Sourcetree
- GitKraken Desktop vs gitg
- Git vs Sourcetree
- Git vs gitg
- TortoiseGit vs Sourcetree
- TortoiseGit vs gitg
- Sourcetree vs Tower
- Sourcetree vs Kommit
All git clients comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




