Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Git Clients

gitg vs Fork

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score gitg #6 in Git Clients 6.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit gitg
Fork #8 in Git Clients 6.8/10 From $59/user ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Fork

gitg leads on 1 check, Fork on 3, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoregitg · 6.9/10
  • Free planonly gitg
  • Most featuresFork · 3 of 3

gitg scores higher on our rubric for git clients: 6.9 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.

gitg offers free plan; Fork doesn't. Fork offers visual history; gitg doesn't publish it. Fork offers conflict resolution; gitg doesn't publish it. Fork offers submodule support; gitg doesn't publish it.

gitg is the better fit for linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks. Fork is the better fit for desktop users who want a one-time-purchase Git GUI.

  • gitg fits best

    Linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks

  • Fork fits best

    Desktop users who want a one-time-purchase Git GUI

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature gitg 6.9/10 Visit ↗ Fork 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.9 6.8
Ranking #6 in Git Clients #8 in Git Clients
Best for Linux or Windows users needing basic visual Git tasks Desktop users who want a one-time-purchase Git GUI
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Linux, Windows Windows, macOS
Support Community Docs
Built for Solo, Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features gitg 0/3 · Fork 3/3
Visual history Not published ✓ (best)
Conflict resolution Not published ✓ (best)
Submodule support Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Supported platforms Not published macOS, Windows
Repository hosting Not published GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, self-hosted Git repositories
Git workflows Not published branching, merging, rebasing, interactive rebasing, cherry-picking, stashing
Our review
Pros
  • Visualizes repository history, files, commits, and diffs
  • Supports cloning repositories and adding existing ones
  • Stages changes, creates commits, and retrieves patches
  • Visual history, staging, and branch management in one desktop client
  • Supports interactive rebase, cherry-pick, stash, and conflict resolution
  • Connects to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps
Cons
  • Focused on common Git tasks rather than advanced workflows
  • Desktop deployment does not cover other platforms
  • Support is community-based
  • No free plan; the license costs $59 per user
  • Available only for macOS and Windows
  • Desktop-focused, with no mobile or web client
Our verdict

For developers who prefer a desktop interface for everyday repository work, gitg offers a free, open-source graphical Git client developed for the GNOME ecosystem. It runs on Linux and Windows and covers common tasks: browsing repository…

Read the review →

Fork is a desktop Git client for Windows and macOS, aimed at developers who prefer a visual interface for everyday repository work. It brings commit and branch history, repository management, staging, and committing into one application,…

Read the review →
  1. gitgGit Clients 6.9Free plan
  2. ForkGit Clients 6.8From $59/user

Strengths and trade-offs

  • gitg — where it wins

    • Visualizes repository history, files, commits, and diffs
    • Supports cloning repositories and adding existing ones
    • Stages changes, creates commits, and retrieves patches

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on common Git tasks rather than advanced workflows
    • Desktop deployment does not cover other platforms
    • Support is community-based

  • Fork — where it wins

    • Visual history, staging, and branch management in one desktop client
    • Supports interactive rebase, cherry-pick, stash, and conflict resolution
    • Connects to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; the license costs $59 per user
    • Available only for macOS and Windows
    • Desktop-focused, with no mobile or web client

More comparisons

All git clients comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on git clients

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update