Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Software Composition Analysis Software

FOSSA vs OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score FOSSA #2 in Software Composition Analysis Software 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit FOSSA

FOSSA leads on 0 checks, OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFOSSA · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth

FOSSA scores higher on our rubric for software composition analysis software: 9.3 against 8.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #12.

On deployment options, FOSSA gives you Hybrid where OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis offers Cloud.

FOSSA is the better fit for hybrid teams needing mature SCA. OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis is the better fit for organizations wanting established vendor backing.

  • FOSSA fits best

    Hybrid teams needing mature SCA

  • OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis fits best

    Organizations wanting established vendor backing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature FOSSA 9.3/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.1
Ranking #2 in Software Composition Analysis Software #12 in Software Composition Analysis Software
Best for Hybrid teams needing mature SCA Organizations wanting established vendor backing
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $20/site/mo —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs · 24/7
Compliance SOC 2, SSO/SAML, 2FA SOC 2, ISO 27001, SSO/SAML
Integrations 7 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features FOSSA 3/3 · OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis 3/3
SBOM generation ✓ ✓
Reachability analysis ✓ ✓
Pull request scanning ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported ecosystems JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl C# / NuGet / Paket; Go / Go Modules / Go Dep / Bazel; Java and Kotlin / Gradle / Maven / Bazel; JavaScript / NPM / Yarn / Bower; Objective-C / CocoaPods; PHP / Composer; Python / Pip / Pipenv / UV / Poetry; Ruby / RubyGems; Rust / Cargo; Swift / CocoaPods; Scala / SBT
Monitored projects 10 projects Not checked yet
Deployment options Hybrid Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Direct, transitive, and reachability analysis for dependencies
  • SBOM generation, import, export, and management
  • Broad CI/CD, source-control, container, and policy capabilities
  • Scans vulnerabilities, licenses, dependencies, and project health
  • Supports CycloneDX and SPDX SBOM workflows
  • Adds reachability analysis, policy automation, and CI/CD scanning
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 5 projects
  • Business includes 10 projects or SBOM imports
  • Business pricing is billed annually
  • Premium and Enterprise pricing requires contact with sales
  • Reachability analysis is limited to supported ecosystems
  • Automated dependency fixes apply only to supported languages
Our verdict

FOSSA is a software supply chain security and compliance platform for engineering, security, and legal teams. It analyzes direct and transitive open-source dependencies, identifies license and vulnerability issues, generates and manages…

Read the review →

OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis is a cloud-deployed platform for development, security, and compliance teams managing open-source and third-party dependency risk. It scans for vulnerabilities, license compliance issues, and…

Read the review →
  1. FOSSASoftware Composition Analysis Software 9.3Free plan
  2. OpenText Fortify Software Composition AnalysisSoftware Composition Analysis Software 8.1Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • FOSSA — where it wins

    • Direct, transitive, and reachability analysis for dependencies
    • SBOM generation, import, export, and management
    • Broad CI/CD, source-control, container, and policy capabilities

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 5 projects
    • Business includes 10 projects or SBOM imports
    • Business pricing is billed annually
  • OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis — where it wins

    • Scans vulnerabilities, licenses, dependencies, and project health
    • Supports CycloneDX and SPDX SBOM workflows
    • Adds reachability analysis, policy automation, and CI/CD scanning

    Where it doesn't

    • Premium and Enterprise pricing requires contact with sales
    • Reachability analysis is limited to supported ecosystems
    • Automated dependency fixes apply only to supported languages
  • FOSSA9.3/10 · Free plan

    A mature SCA platform covering dependencies, SBOMs, containers, licenses, and policy controls.

    Visit FOSSAFull verdict →
  • OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis8.1/10 · Free plan

    A broad SCA platform with free access, enterprise controls, and sales-led pricing.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update