Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Software Composition Analysis Software

FOSSA vs Mend SCA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score FOSSA #2 in Software Composition Analysis Software 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit FOSSA

FOSSA leads on 1 check, Mend SCA on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFOSSA · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly FOSSA

FOSSA scores higher on our rubric for software composition analysis software: 9.3 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

FOSSA offers free plan; Mend SCA doesn't.

FOSSA is the better fit for hybrid teams needing mature SCA. Mend SCA is the better fit for enterprises needing hybrid SCA.

  • FOSSA fits best

    Hybrid teams needing mature SCA

  • Mend SCA fits best

    Enterprises needing hybrid SCA

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature FOSSA 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Mend SCA 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.5
Ranking #2 in Software Composition Analysis Software #8 in Software Composition Analysis Software
Best for Hybrid teams needing mature SCA Enterprises needing hybrid SCA
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $20/site/mo $1,000/user/yr
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Docs Email, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 7 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features FOSSA 3/3 · Mend SCA 3/3
SBOM generation ✓ ✓
Reachability analysis ✓ ✓
Pull request scanning ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported ecosystems JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl C/C++/Conan, C#/.NET/NuGet, Go, Java/Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm/yarn/pnpm, PHP/Composer, Python/pip/Poetry/Conda/uv, Ruby/Bundler, Scala/sbt, Swift/SwiftPM/CocoaPods, Rust/Cargo, Haskell/Cabal, Elixir/Erlang/Hex, Bazel, OCaml
Monitored projects 10 projects Not checked yet
Deployment options Hybrid Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Direct, transitive, and reachability analysis for dependencies
  • SBOM generation, import, export, and management
  • Broad CI/CD, source-control, container, and policy capabilities
  • Reachability analysis helps prioritize vulnerable dependencies
  • Generates SPDX and CycloneDX SBOMs and supports VEX data
  • Supports hybrid deployment across repositories, CI/CD, and IDEs
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 5 projects
  • Business includes 10 projects or SBOM imports
  • Business pricing is billed annually
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • No verified free plan is listed
  • Broader supply-chain coverage may exceed narrow SCA needs
Our verdict

FOSSA is a software supply chain security and compliance platform for engineering, security, and legal teams. It analyzes direct and transitive open-source dependencies, identifies license and vulnerability issues, generates and manages…

Read the review →

Mend SCA analyzes open-source dependencies for vulnerabilities, license risks, malicious packages, and software supply-chain exposure. It is designed for development and security teams working across repositories, CI/CD pipelines, IDEs,…

Read the review →
  1. FOSSASoftware Composition Analysis Software 9.3Free plan
  2. Mend SCASoftware Composition Analysis Software 8.5Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • FOSSA — where it wins

    • Direct, transitive, and reachability analysis for dependencies
    • SBOM generation, import, export, and management
    • Broad CI/CD, source-control, container, and policy capabilities

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 5 projects
    • Business includes 10 projects or SBOM imports
    • Business pricing is billed annually
  • Mend SCA — where it wins

    • Reachability analysis helps prioritize vulnerable dependencies
    • Generates SPDX and CycloneDX SBOMs and supports VEX data
    • Supports hybrid deployment across repositories, CI/CD, and IDEs

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • No verified free plan is listed
    • Broader supply-chain coverage may exceed narrow SCA needs
  • FOSSA9.3/10 · Free plan

    A mature SCA platform covering dependencies, SBOMs, containers, licenses, and policy controls.

    Visit FOSSAFull verdict →
  • Mend SCA8.5/10 · Paid

    A hybrid SCA platform combining dependency risk analysis, SBOM, reachability, and remediation.

    Visit Mend.ioFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update