Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Software Composition Analysis Software

FOSSA vs Black Duck SCA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score FOSSA #2 in Software Composition Analysis Software 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit FOSSA
Black Duck SCA #4 in Software Composition Analysis Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Black Duck

FOSSA leads on 0 checks, Black Duck SCA on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFOSSA · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly FOSSA

FOSSA scores higher on our rubric for software composition analysis software: 9.3 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.

FOSSA is the better fit for hybrid teams needing mature SCA. Black Duck SCA is the better fit for large enterprises needing broad analysis.

  • FOSSA fits best

    Hybrid teams needing mature SCA

  • Black Duck SCA fits best

    Large enterprises needing broad analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature FOSSA 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Black Duck SCA 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.9
Ranking #2 in Software Composition Analysis Software #4 in Software Composition Analysis Software
Best for Hybrid teams needing mature SCA Large enterprises needing broad analysis
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $20/site/mo —
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Docs Docs
Compliance SOC 2, SSO/SAML, 2FA ISO 27001
Integrations 7 integrations 13 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features FOSSA 3/3 · Black Duck SCA 3/3
SBOM generation ✓ ✓
Reachability analysis ✓ ✓
Pull request scanning ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported ecosystems JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl BitBake, Cargo, Carthage, CocoaPods, Conan, Conda, CPAN, CRAN, Dart, Go, Gradle, Hex, Ivy, Lerna, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PEAR, pip, pnpm, Poetry, RubyGems, SBT, Setuptools, Swift, Yarn, Xcode, OPAM, UV, Rush
Monitored projects 10 projects Not checked yet
Deployment options Hybrid Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Direct, transitive, and reachability analysis for dependencies
  • SBOM generation, import, export, and management
  • Broad CI/CD, source-control, container, and policy capabilities
  • Analyzes dependencies, binaries, snippets, and software bills of materials.
  • Supports reachability, policy enforcement, and continuous application monitoring.
  • Covers many ecosystems with source-control, CI/CD, and IDE integrations.
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 5 projects
  • Business includes 10 projects or SBOM imports
  • Business pricing is billed annually
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than self-serve plans.
  • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of dependency-only teams.
  • Hybrid deployment may require planning across hosted and self-hosted environments.
Our verdict

FOSSA is a software supply chain security and compliance platform for engineering, security, and legal teams. It analyzes direct and transitive open-source dependencies, identifies license and vulnerability issues, generates and manages…

Read the review →

Black Duck SCA helps development, DevOps, and security teams identify and manage risks in open-source and third-party software. Its coverage spans dependency, binary, and snippet analysis, with capabilities for vulnerability…

Read the review →
  1. FOSSASoftware Composition Analysis Software 9.3Free plan
  2. Black Duck SCASoftware Composition Analysis Software 8.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • FOSSA — where it wins

    • Direct, transitive, and reachability analysis for dependencies
    • SBOM generation, import, export, and management
    • Broad CI/CD, source-control, container, and policy capabilities

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 5 projects
    • Business includes 10 projects or SBOM imports
    • Business pricing is billed annually
  • Black Duck SCA — where it wins

    • Analyzes dependencies, binaries, snippets, and software bills of materials.
    • Supports reachability, policy enforcement, and continuous application monitoring.
    • Covers many ecosystems with source-control, CI/CD, and IDE integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than self-serve plans.
    • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of dependency-only teams.
    • Hybrid deployment may require planning across hosted and self-hosted environments.
  • FOSSA9.3/10 · Free plan

    A mature SCA platform covering dependencies, SBOMs, containers, licenses, and policy controls.

    Visit FOSSAFull verdict →
  • Black Duck SCA8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad SCA coverage for enterprises managing open-source risk across the SDLC.

    Visit Black DuckFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update