Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Low-Code Business Process Management

Flowable vs WEBCON BPS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Flowable #4 in Low-Code Business Process Management 8.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Flowable
WEBCON BPS #7 in Low-Code Business Process Management 8.0/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 2 of 2 features Visit WEBCON BPS

Flowable leads on 1 check, WEBCON BPS on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFlowable · 8.3/10
  • Free planonly Flowable
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresWEBCON BPS · 2 of 2

Flowable scores higher on our rubric for low-code business process management: 8.3 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Flowable offers free plan; WEBCON BPS doesn't.

Flowable is the better fit for teams needing BPMN, case, and decision modeling. WEBCON BPS is the better fit for mid-size and enterprise teams using Microsoft tools.

  • Flowable fits best

    Teams needing BPMN, case, and decision modeling

  • WEBCON BPS fits best

    Mid-size and enterprise teams using Microsoft tools

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Flowable 8.3/10 Visit ↗ WEBCON BPS 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.3 8.0
Ranking #4 in Low-Code Business Process Management #7 in Low-Code Business Process Management
Best for Teams needing BPMN, case, and decision modeling Mid-size and enterprise teams using Microsoft tools
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — —
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 30 days 30 days
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Tickets, Community, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR ISO 27001
Integrations 30+ integrations 10 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Flowable 0/2 · WEBCON BPS 2/2
Workflow automation Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Process analytics Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Process modeling Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Both
Listed integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Combines BPMN, CMMN, and DMN automation engines
  • Supports conditional and parallel routing, forms, and integrated testing
  • Offers cloud and self-hosted deployment with audit trails and observability
  • Combines workflow modeling, configurable forms, automation, and analytics.
  • Connects with Microsoft tools, databases, REST, and SOAP services.
  • Offers SaaS, private cloud, and on-premises deployment options.
Cons
  • Commercial pricing requires contacting sales
  • The Agentic Case Platform adds AI-agent orchestration that may exceed simpler BPM needs
  • Community Edition lists community support rather than commercial support channels
  • No free plan; paid pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Subscription editions and user tiers add licensing choices to evaluate.
  • The feature breadth may exceed the needs of teams with simple workflows.
Our verdict

Flowable brings process orchestration, case management, and decision modeling together for mid-market and enterprise teams, particularly those handling regulated operations. Its BPMN, CMMN, and DMN engines support different kinds of work…

Read the review →

WEBCON BPS is a low-code business process management platform for organizations that need to design, automate, operate, and analyze workflows. It is aimed at IT teams, business users, and process teams across areas such as finance, HR,…

Read the review →
  1. FlowableLow-Code Business Process Management 8.3Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. WEBCON BPSLow-Code Business Process Management 8.0Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Flowable — where it wins

    • Combines BPMN, CMMN, and DMN automation engines
    • Supports conditional and parallel routing, forms, and integrated testing
    • Offers cloud and self-hosted deployment with audit trails and observability

    Where it doesn't

    • Commercial pricing requires contacting sales
    • The Agentic Case Platform adds AI-agent orchestration that may exceed simpler BPM needs
    • Community Edition lists community support rather than commercial support channels
  • WEBCON BPS — where it wins

    • Combines workflow modeling, configurable forms, automation, and analytics.
    • Connects with Microsoft tools, databases, REST, and SOAP services.
    • Offers SaaS, private cloud, and on-premises deployment options.

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; paid pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Subscription editions and user tiers add licensing choices to evaluate.
    • The feature breadth may exceed the needs of teams with simple workflows.
  • Flowable8.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    Flowable combines BPMN, CMMN, and DMN modeling with case management and workflow automation.

    Visit FlowableFull verdict →
  • WEBCON BPS8.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A broad BPM suite for Microsoft-oriented teams that need flexible deployment and process analytics.

    Visit WEBCON BPSFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update